Tags
banklords, changing words, common law jurisdiction, common law replaced by Roman Codes, eroding sovereignty, fiat currency, individual sovereignty eroding, J. Edgar Hoover, John Kennedy, Kennedy's warning, Lieber Code, Mayer Amschel Rothschild, Napoleonic Code, Roman Civil Codes, Rothschild, sovereign documents, sovereignty, unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
A Time For Choosing, Part I
THE RELATIONSHIP AMONG BANKLORDS, FIAT CURRENCY, AND ECONOMIC HARDSHIP
by Steven Pattison copyright 2011
(Nov. 2, 2011) — By reading the following, you will learn the reason for our current situation and how it took place in other countries with the same results we will have soon.
Some will not believe what they are about to read! Others such as J. Edgar Hoover and President John F. Kennedy have reported about the fact that there is a conspiracy:
J. Edgar Hoover – The Elks Magazine (August 1956)
“The individual is handicapped by coming face to face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists.”
President John F. Kennedy address before ‘The American Newspaper Publishers Association’ at Waldorf-Astoria Hotel on April 27, 1961:
“For we are opposed around the world by a monolithic and ruthless conspiracy that relies primarily on covert means for expanding its sphere of influence on infiltration instead of invasion, on subversion instead of elections, on intimidation instead of free choice, on guerrillas by night instead of armies by day.”
A sign of the present, and just what does the future hold for America?
A JOYOUS FUTURE, yes there will be, if you get involved!
America is “Temporarily” out of order!
All ‘We the People’ need is to get in Order so you can be a service to our country.
To get into Order, all anyone has to do is learn the truth and the Plan will happen with all the good people working collectively. It will never work any other way, for it took the banklords over 200 years to totally take over our Country. The following presentation of history may not be completely accurate, but it will connect the dots leading most of us to a better understanding of what is going on today. For that reason I implore you to just read this document before going to any web links.
I would have to believe there are a lot of people even today that just want to be left alone, which was the reason most people came to America in 1643, the beginning of our Country.The people who came to America were running from what was happening in Great Britain involving the King of England, Parliament, the aristocracy, the middle classes, the commoners, and the army, called the English Civil War of the mid-17th Century. It was part of a wider series of conflicts that spanned the entire British Isles, involving Scotland and Ireland as well as England, Wales and the division of the Catholic Church which occurred over whether or not Jesus Christ was a spirit. The English Civil War was also called “The Great Rebellion,” “The English Revolution” and “The Wars of the Three Kingdoms.” Continue Reading
A Time for Choosing, Part II
HOW COMMON LAW WAS REPLACED WITH ROMAN CIVIL CODES TO THE DETRIMENT OF FREEDOM by Steven Pattison copyright 2011
(Nov. 9, 2011) —Editor’s Note: The following essay is a continuation of the ideas presented in Part 1 of this series.
The major systems of law in European history were Roman law, feudal law, canon law, civil law, English common law and the Napoleonic Code. The use of international law in the twentieth century was for the purpose of the banks having control over trade. Napoleonic Code is the laws of Louisiana and Roman Civil Codes titled here in our Country as ‘United States Codes’ which are what every State of the Union is using, making them all de facto, a point which will be covered later.
Today there is nowhere to run to escape what is happening to our Country because the banklords control all the money of the other countries through the IMF. If you don’t get involved now, our Country will continue down the path of corruption under the current Conspiracy. Even the Congress of the United States reports the same facts of our destruction within its Congressional Findings:
(a) Findings Relating to Federal Income Tax- Congress finds the Federal income tax–
(1) retards economic growth and has reduced the standard of living of the American public;
(2) impedes the international competitiveness of United States industry;
(3) reduces savings and investment in the United States by taxing income multiple times;
(4) slows the capital formation necessary for real wages to steadily increase;
(5) lowers productivity;
(6) imposes unacceptable and unnecessary administrative and compliance costs on individual and business taxpayers;
(7) is unfair and inequitable;
(8) unnecessarily intrudes upon the privacy and civil rights of United States citizens;
(9) hides the true cost of government by embedding taxes in the costs of everything Americans buy;
(10) is not being complied with at satisfactory levels and therefore raises the tax burden on law abiding citizens; and
(11) impedes upward social mobility.
Continue Reading
A Time for Choosing, Part III
HOW COMMON LAW WAS CHANGED TO ROMAN LAW, ERODING INDIVIDUAL SOVEREIGNTY ESTABLISHED BY THE FOUNDERS
by Steven Pattison copyright 2011
(Nov. 11, 2011) — Editor’s Note: The following essay is the final in a three-part series regarding the topics of common law, statutory law, liberty, global monetary and financial conspiracy, and individual and state sovereignty. Parts 1 and 2 can be found here and here.
‘WE’ all allowed Common Law to be taken from us without a thing being said. Our State and National Constitutions are not understandable without Common Law, as HENRY BALDWIN, an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States explained in his book published in 1837:
I have long since been convinced that there are better and safer guides to professional and judicial inquiries after truth, on constitutional questions, than those which have been so often resorted to, without effecting the desired result; a clear and settled understanding of the terms and provisions of an instrument of writing, which operates with supreme authority wherever it applies. To me it seems that it can be made intelligible in all its parts, by applying to it those established rules and maxims of the common law, in the construction of statutes, and those accepted definitions of words, terms, and language, in which they had been used, and been received, as well known and understood, in their ordinary, or legal sense, according to the subject matter. In appealing to the common law, as the standard of exposition, in all doubts as to the meaning of written instruments; there is safety, certainty, and authority. The institution of the colonies were based upon it; it was their system of jurisprudence, with only local exceptions, to suit the condition of the colonists, who claimed it as their birth-right and inheritance, 9 Cr. 333, in its largest sense, as including the whole system of English jurisprudence, 1 Gall. 493; the inexhaustible fountain from which we draw our laws, 9 S. & R. 330, 39, 58. So it continued after the colonies became states, in most of which the common law was adopted by acts of assembly, which gave it the force of a statute, from the time of such adoption, and as it was then; so that in the language of this Court-”At the adoption of the constitution, there were no states in this Union, the basis of whose jurisprudence was not essentially, that of the common law in its widest meaning; and probably no states were contemplated, in which it would not exist.” 3 Pet. 446, 8. It is also the basis on which the federal system of jurisprudence was erected by the constitution, the judiciary and process acts, which refer to “cases in law and in equity,” “suits at common law,” “the common law, the principles and usages of law,” as they had at the time been defined and settled in England; 5 Cr. 222; 3 Wh. 221; 4 Wh. 115, 16; 7 Wh. 45; 10 Wh. 29, 32, 56, 8; 1 Pet. 613: and were adopted as then understood by the old states.
WE have determined that since the only law was ‘Common Law’ when the National Constitution was written, in Section 2 of Article III of the ‘Constitution for the United States’, ‘in Law’ can mean only ‘Common Law’. In fact, everything except “admiralty and maritime Jurisdiction” should be under Common Law Jurisdiction.
State Sovereignty
ARE THERE STILL “FREE AND
INDEPENDENT STATES?”
by Steven Pattison copyright 2011
(Oct. 31, 2011) — The following information is a result of word searches of the bolded words or terms from the Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004). Before we get to the dictionary, there must be an understanding that what we have in this dictionary is a long-time scheme to defraud the American people.
The meanings of the words that are used in law are important, and hopefully you will be able to prove to yourself where our problem with the Federal Government stems with a little help from the following research. The following is directed at men and women who inhabit within one of the fifty current states of the Union known as the ‘united States of America’ which is taken directly from the ‘The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America’ dated ‘IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776. This document is the key for our future Freedom. This document has been referred to as the ‘Declaration of Independence’ and “signed by the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies.”
Their ‘intentions’ were to make it known to the world the acts of the King that were unjust and unlawful, which is not much different from what is going on today. Because there are so many of us who still do not fully understand what is going on with our once-great country, the following presentation for your education of the words used to ‘inslave’ us has been prepared. The current master tells us that the word ‘inslave’ is a misspelled word used to prove a point that someday you may see it spelled this way if enough of us continue to use this spelling. That is how words acquire different meanings over time. Someone changes the meaning and over time it is accepted, but the only People who can change any meaning of words used to run this once-great country is the Congress of the united States of America, meaning the government located in DC and sometimes referred to as the United States. the United States Supreme Court has declared that there are three different meanings for the term ‘United States’ which was caused by the Congress not simply standing with words that had already been used and the meanings known by all at that time. The ‘united States of America’ government should have been used many times and it was not, so it left the door open for the United States Supreme Court to declare that it had three meanings which was a start of the System being created. Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed. 1990), Page 1523, states:
United States. This term has several meanings.
Black’s Law Dictionary (6th ed. 1990), does not define the term, ‘United States of America’.
The term, ‘United States’ is not defined in the Black’s Law Dictionary (7th ed. 1999), but on page 1534, ‘United States of America’ is defined as:
A federal republic formed after the War of Independence and made up of 48 conterminous states, plus the state of Alaska and the District of Columbia in North America, plus the state of Hawaii in the Pacific.
Black’s Law Dictionary (8th ed. 2004), Page 4768:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A federal republic formed after the War of Independence and made up of 48 conterminous states, plus the state of Alaska and the District of Columbia in North America, plus the state of Hawaii in the Pacific. — Abbr. USA. [Cases: United States 1. C.J.S. United States §§ 2–3.]
The last paragraph of the ‘PREFACE’ of Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition:
A Final Word of Caution
The language of the law is ever-changing as the courts, Congress, state legislatures, and administrative agencies continue to define, redefine and expand legal words and terms. Furthermore, many legal terms are subject to variations from state to state and again can differ under federal laws. Also, the type of legal issue, dispute or transaction involved can affect a given definition usage. Accordingly, a legal dictionary should only be used as a “starting point” for definitions. Additional research should follow for state or federal variations, for further or later court interpretations, and for specific applications. Helpful sources for supplemental research are “Words and Phrases” and WESTLAW.
THE PUBLISHER
St. Paul, Minn.
July, 1990
Iv
_____________________
Changing the meaning of words created confusion so that they had to hire an attorney if they ever had to go to a court of law, resulting in only the People with money being able to buy freedom. The point is simple: if you know who you are and where you inhabit, using the correct words, even if you have to define them in your document, could restore our one-great country back to all the People.
My point is to inform you that there is no quick solution, just as there was not a quick solution for the above ‘Declaration’ which took many years of wrongs done by the King and his men before it was even written. Then there was the ensuing war which was fought to give us ‘Free and Independent States,’ a phrase used within the Declaration. These ‘Free and Independent States’ each were created by their first Constitution, written by the duly elected Representatives who were either appointed or elected by the collective ‘State Citizens’ inhabiting within the borders of these states, which is why all the People inhabiting within the borders of these ‘Free and Independent States’ were collectively represented and collective owners of the first governments of each of these ‘Free and Independent States.’ Soon after the war, there were plans to create a ‘System’ to take back these ‘Free and Independent States’ by the banklords. Quotes supporting that belief, the first of which was written before 1812 and the second in 1863, which relate to the War of 1812 and the American Civil War are:
“Give me control of a nation’s money and I care not who makes her laws.” – Mayer Amschel Rothschild’s (1744 -1812), Godfather of the Rothschild Banking Cartel
“The few who understand the system will either be so interested from its profits or so dependent on its favors that there will be no opposition from that class.” — Rothschild Brothers of London, 1863
Knowing these facts presented on this website caused the following webpage to be produced: A Time Line focusing on Taxes, Money and War showing the events that caused both wars, the desire to control our money.
Ben Franklin wrote, “The inability of Colonists to get power to issue their own money permanently out of the hands of George III and the international bankers was the prime reason for the Revolutionary War.” By Gary Jacobucci – posted here
“There is no question that the sovereign people of this nation have been victimized by a silent economic war through most of the twentieth century. In the last four decades, institutionalized aggression has become increasingly bolder. If the de facto system continues unabated, only a small political and financial privileged class will enjoy prosperity and liberty — not liberty ordinary people seek, but what amounts to license for plunder.” – Institutionalized Tyranny The Charactor & Color of Authority
First, one must agree to some degree that the banklords are behind what is still going on in our country or in fact, the world. Now you will have to learn that you no longer officially inhabit one of these ‘Free and Independent States.’ Once you prove this fact to yourself, you will need to prove it to everyone you know. You should not act without a group that agrees with you so you have the support to take the next needed step.
Continue Reading
