Tags

, , , , , , ,

Structure of the Birth Certificate

 Did the State Pledge Your Body To A Bank?

By David Deschesne

Right: Some birth and marriage certificates are now “warehouse receipts,” printed on banknote paper, which may mark you and yours as ‘chattel’ property of the banks that our government borrows from every day.

 A certificate is a “paper establishing an ownership claim.” – Barron’s Dictionary of Banking Terms. Registration of births began in 1915, by the Bureau of Census, with all states adopting the practice by 1933.

Birth and marriage certificates are a form of securities called “warehouse receipts.” The items included on a warehouse receipt, as descried at §7-202 of the Uniform Commercial Code, the law which governs commercial paper and transactions,

(Blog Master’s Note: Please continue reading this at the website from the link under the author’s name.  At the bottom is a pdf file.  On the website “American Bank Note Company” is used.  On my personal Birth Certificate, down in the bottom right hand corner is ” Midwest Bank Note Company” and it is on Bond paper. My name on my certified copy is not in all capital letters.   I have provided to 2 Examples of setting the record  in court that your name is not in all capital letters. )
 
(For Austin) 

THE CERTIFICATE OF REGISTRATION OF LIVE BIRTH IS BY BANKING DEFINITION TERMED “A CERTIFICATED SECURITY”

 FROM THE BANK OFFICERS HANDBOOK OF COMMERCIAL BANKING LAW WITHIN THE UNITED STATES

¶ 22.07[6][a] SECURITY TRANSACTIONS 22-72

[a] Certified Securities. Certificated securities are stocks, bonds, and the like. The 1977 version of Article 8 of the UCC defines them as interests “represented by instruments” that are issued in “bearer or registered form”; that are of the type commonly traded on securities exchanges or markets or recognized as a medium for investment; that are one of a class or series; and that provide evidence of a share, a participation, or another interest in an issuer’s property enterprise, or obligation. UCC § 8-102(1).

The definition of certificated security is sufficiently broad so that it may sweep under its coverage instruments that, on first impression, might not be thought of as securities. The definition does not require that the interest in question actually be traded upon a securities exchange or other market. It is enough, as the comments indicate, that the interests are ” ’of a type’ commonly traded in those markets.” UCC § 8-102. When the interest is classified as a security, it is governed by Article 8, rather than by Article 9, on questions of enforceability and perfection of security interests. The rules in Articles 8 and 9 for perfecting security interests in instruments and securities are generally comparable, as they both require possession, but there are some differences.

As a general rule, a security interest in a certificated security is perfected in the same way as under the prior version of the UCC. The secured party must take possession, or, when the security is in the hand of the bailee, must give notice to the bailee. UCC §§ 8-313(1)(a), 8-313(1)(c), 8-313(1)(e), 8-313(1)(h), 8-321(1). It is possible for a security interest to be temporarily perfected, as was the case under the former version of the UCC for a period of twenty-one days without possession by a secured party. See UCC §§ 8-321(2), 8-313(4). Compare also, UCC § 9-304. When the certificated security is transferred outright to the secured party, no written security agreement signed by the debtor is needed to make the security interest enforceable. UCC §§ 8-321(3)(b). A written security agreement signed by the debtor and describing the collateral is required when the security is in the possession of the bank or broker holding the security in an account for the debtor (who is the banker’s or broker’s customer), or when the security is held by some other third person. UCC §§ 8-313(h)(i), 8-313(h)(ii). Compare UCC § 8-313(1)(e), which does not require a written security agreement when a security is held by a third person other than a bank or a broker who acknowledges that he or she is holding for the secured party.

Article 8 makes a significant change in requiring that the secured party or the secured party’s agent possess the certificated security, not only to perfect a security interest (in cases where the temporary perfection rules don’t apply) but also for the security interest to attach and to be enforceable. UCC § 8-321(1). Under the previous version of Article 8, although the security interest would not be perfected until the secured party took possession, the secured party would have in the security an unperfected security interest, which could be enforced against the debtor as long as a sufficient written security agreement existed and there were no third parties with superior rights to the collateral. UCC §§ 9-201, 9-203.

NOTE: I strongly suspect when the Nation State of your birth, issued a Notice of Birth Registration, it was acting as a subsidiary corporation and agent for the parent Federal Corporation, United States Inc., offering a share of “certificated” stock in the United States Inc., premised on your acceptance of that offer and participate as an American Citizen. The debtor United States at all times, is the obligor on the face value of said stock under public policy’s prime directive “dollar for dollar” as a negotiable security. The 9th Circuit Court in the below case, held: “a share or similar equity interest issued by a corporation . . . is a security.” When you’re holding a copy of your registered birth certification, it bears your name on the certificate, clearly noting that you are the duly registered party of that “Certificated Security.” You are a stock holder and creditor in the U.S. Inc. and thereby, pre-paid and exempt from levy. (How is it reasonable to believe the debtor has the right or power to tax the Creditor) The fly in the ointment is the assigned public vessel, a legislatively constructive debtor vessel that holds all material property interest of the stock holder.

In Re Norman C. Turley 172 F.3d 671 (9th Cir. 1999).

 

(Example #1)

AFFIDAVIT OF ABATEMENT

Nul tiel corporation

NOTICE OF ASSERTION IN ABATEMENT IS GIVEN THAT NO SUCH CORPORATION EXISTS;(Your Name Normal)  a Sovereign Man of Standing denies there is no such Corporation bearing the name “YOUR NAME ALL CAPSnor is such presumed corporation assignable

to said Sovereign Manby legislative fiat

Whereas,

(Your Name Normal) declares; Nul tiel corporation.No such corporation exists, bearing the name (YOUR NAME,IN ALL CAPS, Last Name first)The form of a plea denying the existence of an alleged corporation. Under the common law practice, a plea of “nul tiel corporation” was a simple negation or a denial of capacity in which the plaintiff sued, and was not an averment of an affirmative fact {New York Bond & Mortgage Co. v. McWilliams, 253 Ill.App. 404}. A plea that plaintiff corporation is not a corporation either de jure or de facto, and consequently not entitled to sue, is not a plea of ultra vires, which assumes an incorporation either de jure or de facto and a misuse of or departure from a franchise, but is a plea of “nul tiel corporation.” {Rialto Co. v. Miner, 166 S.W. 629, 632, 183 Mo.App. 119}. That a Special Plea of Nul Tiel Corporation is necessary to question the Corporate Capacity of the plaintiff, see: 10 Cyc. 1355; Inhabitants of Orono v. Wedgewood, 44 Me. 49, 69 Am.Dec. 81 (1857). Keokuk & Hamilton Bridge Co. v. Wetzel, 228 Ill. 253, 81 N.E. 864 (1907) (which held that a Plea denying that the plaintiff is a corporation is a Plea in Bar, but a Plea denying that the defendant is a corporation is a Plea in Abatement.); Koffler/Reppy, Common Law Pleading, 423 n. 67 (West, 1969).

BACKGROUND

Whereas, there are two (2) classes of citizens under American law never repealed.  Federal citizens were not even contemplated when Article III was being drafted.  Pannill v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914 is definitive and dispositive on this important point.  Federal citizenship is a municipal franchise domiciled in the District of Columbia.  Murphy v. Ramsey , 114 U.S. 15 (1885) (the political rights of federal citizens are franchises which they hold as privileges in the legislative discretion of Congress).

The standing of State Citizens to invoke any Title 42 [Municipal] remedies, in part because these remedies originate in the 1866 Civil Rights Act — a federal municipal statute State Citizens are not subject to federal municipal law. (Emphasis added)At all times, “this state” acting in the name of the State of ______ having legislative jurisdiction gives cause for (Your name normal )to reserve His right to move to a common law cause of action for the appropriation of His birth name to be bastardized for commercial purposes and may be pleaded by alleging (1) “this state’s” misuse of (Your name normal) identity;  (2) the manipulation of (Your name normal) proper name to “this state’s” exclusive advantage, both commercially and otherwise;  (3) lack of consent to craft a likeness of my birth name for commercial and other purposes and to the extreme prejudice of (Your name normal) to wit:(YOUR NAME ALL CAPS);  and (4) the resulting and ongoing injury, both commercial and otherwise. Also, consideration is likewise reserved to move for a RICO investigation regarding the issue of bastardizing the birth name on STATE OF _________ commercial instruments as a for profit enterprise and thereby, a taxable event.“this state’s” decision to use a name upon commercial instruments other than my birth name, whether such decision rests on religious, marital, commercial or other personal considerations, does not imply intent to set aside my birth name, or identity associated with that name. 

Unlike a registered trademark, My proper name cannot be deemed abandoned by Me throughout this possessor’s life, despite any failure to use it, and continue to use it, privately and or commercially Montana v. San Jose Mercury News, Inc. 40 Cal.Rptr.2d 639, 34 Cal.Appl.4th 790 I (Your name spelled normal), declare under penalty of perjury under the laws of the United States of America that the foregoing is true and correct.

Executed on February ______, 2010

With reservation of all rights, remedies and Treaties UCC 1-308

I am:____________________________________________

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

State of _______  )
                               ) SS
County of ______ )

On theday of the second month of the year of Our Lord Jesus Christ in the year two thousand and ten, Personally appeared before Me the above noted (Your name spelled normal) and acknowledged to be the Man given of such proper Christian name, and thereby, making the aforesaid AFFIDAVIT FOR IDENTITY AND OTHER PURPOSES AND FOR CAUSE!

Before Me:Notary for the State of __________

My commission expires: Notary Seal

(Blog Master’s Note: Please see Two Classes of Citizens  )
(Example #2)

AFFIDAVIT AND CAVEAT ATTESTING TO THE NATURAL

 IDENTITY IN FACT OF Name:

Notice and Caveat:

I, _______________________ am who I say I am and specifically object to, and thereby take exception to any and all presumptive process that alleges otherwise. Any process, CIVIL OR CRIMINAL that alleges my natural person to identify with any form or alteration of my given name _____________________ for the express purpose to acquire or gain personal jurisdiction by artifice and/or constructive fraud, is summarily challenged forthwith and thereby notes the burden of proof lies with the party or parties seeking to compel subrogation or traverse to any and all jurisdictions by Wendell Baldwin Bird and by their nature, such civil or criminal process under copyright law are limited to the procedural due process of actual controversies of fictitious parties. Absent full and complete disclosure of the explicit purpose to acquire personal jurisdiction of the Master/authorized representative i.e. Wendell Baldwin Bird in lieu of the named or fictitious/represented party in fact, fraud will be presumed and dealt with accordingly.

See Memorandum in Support of:

 THE DISCERNMENT OF NAMES/Names and PERSONS, natural and otherwise.

Nam: Nothing should be rashly changed {Nil temere novandum; Jenk. Cent. Cas. 163}; Names of things ought to be understood according to common usage, not according to the opinions of individuals {Non ex opinionibus singulorum, sed ex communi usi, nomina exaudiri debent}; Records are vestiges of antiquity and truth {Recorda sunt vestigia vetustatis et veritatis}; Cf. ORS 40.135(r) (Rule 311) (A person is the same person if the name is identical.); State v. Garrett, 281 Or 281, 574 P2d 639 But is not necessarily, representative of the natural person (1978) (Literal identity of names is necessary to trigger presumption of identity of persons so as to present prima facie case, and mere similarity of names, without additional corroborating evidence, will not support finding of identity of persons.); Monroe Cattle Co. v. Becker 147 U.S. 47, 58, 37 L. ed. 72, 13 Sup. Ct. Rep. 217 (1893) (Defendant was impleaded by the name of A. W. Becker. Initials are no legal part of a name, the authorities holding the full Christian name to be essential. Wilson v. Shannon, 6 Ark. 196; Norris v. Graves, 4 Strob. 32; Seely v. Boon, 1 N. J. Law, 138; Chappell v. Proctor, Harp. 49; Kinnersley v. Knott, 7 C. B. 980; Turner v. Fitt, 3 C. B. 701; Oakley v. Pegler, (Neb .) 46 N. W. Rep. 920; Knox v. Starks, 4 Minn. 20, (Gil. 7;) Kenyon v. Semon, (Minn.) 45 N. W. Rep. 10; Beggs v. Wellman, 82 Ala. 391, 2 South. Rep. 877; Nash v. Collier, 5 Dowl. & L. 341; Fewlass v. Abbott, 28 Mich. 270.);

MAXIMUMS OF LAW ON PERSONS

Designatio unius est exclusio alterius, et expressum facit cessare tacitum. The appointment or designation of one is the exclusion of another; and that expressed makes that which is implied to cease. Coke, Litt. 210. Cf. Affirmatio unius exclusio est alterius; Alteration; Designation; Enumeratio unius est exclusio alterius; Expressio unius personæ est exclusio alterius; Expressum facit cessare tacitum; Falsus in uno, falsus in omnibus; Inclusio unius est exclusio alterius; Misnomer; Patent ambiguity; Spoliation; Variance; Burgin v. Forbes, 293 Ky. 456, 169 S.W.2d, 321, 325 (The certain designation of one person is an absolute exclusion of all others.);Expressio unius personæ est exclusio alterius.The mention of one person is the exclusion of another. 

SED VIDE:

Ex multitudine signorum, colligitur identitas vera.From a great number of signs or marks, true identity is gathered or made up.Identitas vera colligitur ex multitudine signorum.  True identity is collected from a multitude of signs. Præsentia corporis tollit errorem nominis, et veritas nominis tollit errorem demonstrationis. The presence of the body cures the error in the name; the truth of the name cures an error in the description. Bacon’s Max. Reg. 25.

VERIFICATION

State of           )
                        ) ss.
County of        )

I, _________________, by statutory definition, being a Natural Person and duly sworn, do hereby verify that the factual statements set forth above are true and accurate, based upon my knowledge, information and belief and legal citation.

By:

___________________________________________________________

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

BE IT REMEMBERED, That on May 16, 2005, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for the state of Oregon, personally appeared the within named:, known to me to be the identical individual described in and who executed the within instrument and acknowledged to me that he executed the same freely and voluntarily.

IN TESTIMONY WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed my official seal the day and year last above written.

 

About these ads