Tags
Birth Certificate, Bonding necessary for prosecution, certificied copy of Birth Certificate, Charges in Admiralty Court, Don't enter the BAR, no pleads outside BAR., Rules of Civil Procedure, sovereign documents, sovereignty, UCC 1-410, Uniform Commercial Code
HOW TO DEAL WITH ALL CHARGES IN
ADMIRALTY COURTS?
Case on Point
BAILIFF: —- People vs. “SMITH”. (in upper case letters)
The charges are two counts of operating a houses of ill-repute: 3 Counts of armed robbery; 2 Counts of murder in the 1st degree; 5 Counts of indecent exposure while dancing in the rain while naked and 30 Counts of bigamy.
JUDGE: (He or She sees only your PERSONS name “SMITH” in his file, and that’s how the case will be addressed, through the PERSON, as long YOU are within the BAR.) DO NOT CROSS THE BAR . . . SPEAK TO THE JUDGE FROM WITHOUT THE BAR . . . ONLY THERE, CAN THE JUDGE SPEAK WITH YOU FLESH TO FLESH! —- State your name. —-
First let me state on the record: I accept your Title and I accept your Bond and;
Your Honor, I will be glad to state my name if you can first show me the certified charges; and that said the charges must evidence my given or birth name affixed for me to likewise accept. —-
JUDGE: —- Accept? —- What are you talking about? —–
THE ACCUSED Smith: —– The court is apparently looking for an ACCEPTOR, as the PRINCIPAL who has the primary obligation to pay or discharge any negotiable debt instrument presented for acceptance, is that not true? (See ACCEPTANCE under 3-410 of the Uniform Commercial Code.)
JUDGE: — Mr. you are accused of some very serious crimes. —- Now how do you plead? IF YOU’R OUTSIDE OF THE BAR YOU WILL NOT BE ASKED TO PLEAD . . . BUT IF WITHIN THE BAR . . .
THE ACCUSED Smith: “I plead guilty to the facts, not the crimes. But first I must determine for the record; do you have the ACCEPTANCE BOND prepared to indemnify the prosecutors statutory commercial offer?
JUDGE: What do you want a bond for?
THE ACCUSED Smith: Whoever filed this complaint is apparently making a CLAIM on my PERSON (this is in reference to the person evidenced in the all upper case NAME of my Trust Account) and comes within the Jurisdiction of an Admiralty /mercantile proceeding.) As I understand the nature of this proceeding, a CLAIM cannot be made unless you first BOND or INDEMNIFY the CLAIM and thereby bring the CLAIM into mercantile consideration, hence the admiralty jurisdiction which I believe you reference as “Civil”.(See FRCP Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; Rule 1 Scope and Purpose )
JUDGE: Well what about that prosecutor?
PROSECUTOR: I’m not sure about that…no, no bond.
THE ACCUSED Smith: What about a BID BOND? Do you have the bid bond?
JUDGE: (pretending not to know) What’s that?
THE ACCUSED Smith: — [Because] A BID BOND is a Bond that was suppose to be completed prior to the arraignment, anticipating should the defendant/principal (or accused) not close, settle, pay or discharge the claim, he thereby, defaults or dishonors the courts charges offered for acceptance. The BID BOND, PERFORMANCE BOND and PAYMENT BOND is then sold to the U.S. District Court where these bonds are bought and traded by Insurance Companies (usually Dunn and Bradstreet) and then sold on the open Bond market. These BONDS are assigned a CUISP number, which Im sure the court clerk has already assigned to this case and are generally acquired by the Japanese and Chinese. By such transactions, the Bond becomes the primary [collateral] source of the private copyright and thereby, a for profit economy and source of funding for the private retirement accounts of all statute merchant Judges / commissioners of these private for profit statutory / mercantile prize courts.
JUDGE: Oh, —– THAT BID BOND. (acting as if he had inadvertently forgot about that)
PROSECUTOR: Judge this is ridiculous. This man is charged with multiple counts of crimes and the state is asking for the max.
JUDGE: What about sir?
THE ACCUSED Smith: —- Your honor, is it not true, this proceeding must either be a TORT action or a COMMERCIAL CRIME?
If it’s a TORT, then there must be an INJURED PARTY an no injured party has presented him or herself at this time, or if this is a COMMERCIAL CRIME, then the prosecution must produce the CONTRACT that I knowingly and with full disclosure of the facts, entered into. Such process must in fact, comply with the Clearfield Doctrine for compulsory production of the contract should a contract in fact exist.
PROSECUTOR: Your honor, this is an outrage!!! This guy is accused of murder.
JUDGE: — NO HE IS NOT!
—-You have no CLAIM against him. (Due to the absence of a BOND)
—- It isn’t his responsibility to BOND OR INDEMNIFY YOUR CLAIMS. —- Sir You’re free to go…
And consider the issue these prosecutors when bringing “charges,” charges which haven’t as yet been certified, indemnified / Bonded, may well be or in fact are “Simulating Legal Process” Which is a class C Felony.
ORS 162.355[1971 c.743 s.210; 1997 c.395 s.1] (Simulating legal process) (1) A person commits the crime of simulating legal process if the person knowingly issues or delivers to another person any document that in form and substance falsely simulates civil or criminal process. (2) As used in this section: (a) “Civil or criminal process” means a document or order, including, but not limited to, a summons, lien, complaint, warrant, injunction, writ, notice, pleading or subpoena, that is issued by a court or that is filed or recorded for the purpose of: (A) Exercising jurisdiction; (B) Representing a claim against a person or property; (C) Directing a person to appear before a court or tribunal; or (D) Directing a person to perform or refrain from performing a specified act. (b) “Person” has the meaning given that term in ORS 161.015, except that in relation to a defendant, “person” means a human being, a public or private corporation, an unincorporated association or a partnership. (3) Simulating legal process is a Class C felony.
The presence of the body cures the error in the name; the truth of the name cures an error in the description.
When in a courtroom one might choose to assert as a belligerent claiment: “For the record judge, the truth is, I am a living man known to many as John Quincy of the Jones family, and I have come here today consenting ONLY to my special appearance and clear up any outstanding administrative matters that seem to require an understandig, as well as to declare my special exception and Standing without the BARas a private manWEREBY YOU AND I MAY COMMUNICATE IN A SUBSTANTIVE MannerFLESH TO FLESH as I am a Man/Woman of substance as it appears you are also.
Whereas, so there is no confusion, I assert my standing as a Beligerent claimant in my personal capacity, I AM the Man in the flesh, John Quincy of the family Jones. The name you speak to from within your BAR and across your bench, goes to “IDEM SONANS” and thereby identifies my PERSON-AL ACCOUNT. This account arises out of a quid pro quo consideration and bears the vessel number, 000-00-0000 indicted on your paperwork as associated with the “JOHN QUINCY JONES”. AT THIS POINT, PRESENT THE ENVELOPE TO THE BAILIFF ACROSS THE BAR, AND WITHIN THAT ENVELOPE WILL BE A CERTIFIED COPY OF THE BOND (Birth Certificate) THAT ARISES FROM THE VALUABLE CONSIDERATION OF YOUR BIRTH REGISTRATION. (Note: The name the judge called is on the Certificated Security and has now been presented to the court and on the record.
And that generally, is how the game is played . . .
Jim_G said:
Jean Keating – It’s all A Tax! Pt 1 – YouTube
There’s a PUBLIC and Private side to the court. When you settle a charge, you settle in the “private” via a Letters Rogatory (One judge to another) to the administrator (colorable/alleged judge). You, John F/o Doe as the Executor accept any charges made and express your wish to settle the matter in the private. Give the administrator of the bankruptcy permission to use your trust to do so and to file all appropriate tax form if needed. You must instruct the administrator that this is a letter sent in the private and NOT TO FILE THIS DOCUMENT IN THE PUBLIC. If done correctly you will not have to appear in the public court. If for any reason you do have to appear in the public court room, it will be to help the court close the case in your favor in a colorable manor (like time served or the cop will not show-up, etc.). In a resent court case, the judge stated that your request to settle the matter in the private cannot be granted in the public arena. The case was postponed because your paper work was file at the last minute, the night before the appearance day. The court and prosecutor were very polite and helpful by giving several choices to accept and suggested what choose to accept in order to make the record reflect a colorable dismissal. Currently constructing a “private” Letters Rogatory for 3 pending cases.
dbhj said:
Hi Jim,
Thanks for the additional information. I do have some of Austin’s documents on ‘Letters Rogatory’ but haven’t posted them yet. Please keep me appraised of the 3 pending cases at dbhjtl@att.net. Thanks again.
Lisa Quinto said:
I am trying to reach/find Jean Keating. Any help would be greatly appreciated.
dbhj said:
Hi Lisa,
I have no idea how to find Jean Keating; sorry.
Sorry, didn’t have my ‘thinking cap on’. Go to the local library, in the Reference Room there should be a book called Hubbles (I think that is right), in that book all attorneys are listed, phone number, address ect.
lisaquinto said:
Jean Keating is a US attorney???
dbhj said:
I thought he was, if not, then I don’t know how to find him.
lisaquinto said:
Oh, and THANKS for answering!
Another question (if I may…). Trying to find out a bit on the DL — do you know anything about Sov.Filing Solutions?
dbhj said:
There are two of Frank ‘Austin’ Endgland’s documents on Driver’s License already posted, I do have another one that will be posted in the future.
Anthony S said:
This all sounds good for so-called criminal court cases. I have a pending divorce in family court. What direction would I take to stop this procedure? As I understand there is no prosecutor in family court. If anyone can help me out I would appreciate it so much. Thank you.
Tiffany said:
My son did this in court however they closed the proceedings and have no written transcript of the proceedings and the judge did leave the bench without dismissing the court or calling resess after my son raised several questions of significance regarding status and jurisdiction and crimes being committed by the courts
dbhj said:
Hi Tiffany,
Bravo for your son!!
Denise
hassan said:
jean keating is not a attorney. his borther is. he has a class on monday at 9pm.et the site is
dbhj said:
Thanks Hassan,
But you left of the website.
Denise
Steven Williams said:
I have claimed a foreclosure property in South Bend, Indiana. i was renting for a year it until the previous owners abandoned it to foreclosure. The Sherrif’s sale was set and I served the Sheriff with a sworn affidavit stating claim to the property as a sovereign national citizens common law right. They sold it and now I am in a civil court hearing where the Judge awarded the investor possession of my home. Once the 2,000 dollar surity bond is paid by the investor who bought it from the Sheriff”s sale and I am served. I will have 48hrs to post a counter bond and go to trial. We all have been trying to get this information to trial and I have gotten there. But I need help. I need the 2K to post my counter claim. I can share all my. Notarized documents and any of your supporting documents as a full defence is afforded to the defendent. I have the ability to submit evidence after evidence after evidence of their commercial corporate fraud.
Can any assist me? I will send my docs first . I also submitted the certified copy of my Notary’s certificate of notary issued by the state. The notary and my witness are both federal employees with a national bank.
Time is of the essence though I expect to be served 8/25/2016 and the the 48Hrs begin.
My number is 26nine 84five 633three if you can call or text me asap.
Thanks
Steven Williams, NAS
greatlakesrehab@yahoo.com
eowyndbh said:
Hi Steven, I wished that I could help you. Most states do not have any Common Law remedies. The entire system is so full of fraud, it is unbelievable. The very best of luck!!! ~ Denise
MICHEAL LEE WARD(c) said:
personally i try to stay out of court, so whenever a summons comes they have my fee schedule and must pay me so I send them a bill and return the Summons Accepted fro Value returned for defects and fraud.. I do not accept third parties… or foreign agents. Only a real claim for which relief may be granted… must provide the proof of standing in an effort of clean hands I gave them 21 days to respond or dispute my counter claim they have no standing in law.. rule 13 counter claims, rule 8… i do not recognize you, you do not represent me, all you have been found incompetent to handle my affairs in god faith without injuring me, therEfore all are fired for incompetence now and forevermore fired.. If this is an attempt to collect a debt you must provide a Tax audit and full proof of wet ink signature contract between myself and You.. or cease and desist this frivolous claim . must respond within 21 days signed wet ink under penalty of perjury anything less is a none response and full taci agreement to all my terms within, the bankruptcy of HJR -192 1933 The UNITED STATES has agreed to set aside all debts of the citizen. you agree that there never was a loan, or a mortgage it never existed. all the broker did was to access my private credit energy of my private trust thru my family name and the social security number you tricked me without full disclosure and under duress convinced me of a loan which never happened. I have rescinded the contract for fraud there is no statute of limitation for fraud, omitting or failure to disclose is fraud. Now by silence you agree to return the clear title deed to me of my private sole ownership property in ten days, you will also correct the status of the credit report in all data recording reporting agencies to show paid as agreed zero balance.. then you shall cease and desist all further actions of any kind. If you agree to these terms with clean hands you need do nothing and the expiration of timely response shall do everything for you. if you wish to dispute these fact you must do so in writing signed under penalty of perjury. anything less is a noen response and is full tacit agreement and waives all rights claims of defense exhausts all defense and disputes. You agree that any further required correspondence shall have the full fee schedules applied.. sincerely Jacob Kyle Ward CEo JACOB KYLE WARD(c) DBA.
eowyndbh said:
Good for you, I hope it continues to work. If you are a non U.S. citizen, check the your State Of CAFR report, you will probably find that federal funds are used to keep the courts running, along with the legislature and police services. That will end their jurisdiction.