Tags
administrative law, Connally v. General Construction Co., definition Nihil Dicit, Diversified Metal Products v. T-Bow Co. Trust, Internal Revenue, Internal Revenue Service, Internal Revenue Service remedy, IRS remedey, Nihil Dicit
(Blog Masters Note:
I apologize to my readers for the delay in posting. I was a necessary delay for reasons of the heart, and I still require more time. I hope you all had a Happy New Year.
All past posts are now in a drop down below comments. )
(For Frank ‘Austin’ England III)
UNDISPUTED CONCLUSIONS
TITLE 15 > CHAPTER 41 > SUBCHAPTER V > § 1692 is an act of Congress designed to protect natural persons ,1692a The term “consumer” means any natural person obligated or allegedly obligated to pay any debt, from abusive collection agency practices, see exhibit 1 of 9 pages;
THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is incorporated in Delaware as a collection agency for a Puerto Rico company; INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICE (IRS) /// For Profit General Delaware Corporation /// Incorporation Date 7/12/33 /// File No. 0325720, see exhibit 2 of 3 pages;
THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE is not a part of the United States government, see: Diversified Metal Products v. T-Bow Co. Trust 158 F.R.D. 660/ IRS 93-405-E-EJL, see exhibit 3 of 3 pages;
Several Corporations involved with the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE are also unlawfully acting under color of law as government agencies, see exhibit 4 of 1 page.
NOTICE
Notice for the agent is notice for the principal applies under this notice.
Notification of legal responsibility is “the first essential of due process of law.” Connally v. General Construction Co., 269 U.S. 385, 391 (1926).
Your silence stands a consent, and tacit approval, for the declarations of facts and conclusions here being established as fact, as a law matter and this affidavit absent timely rebuttle, will stand as final judgment in this matter.
Failure to reply with-in thirty days, establishes you are in agreement with the foregoing and are thusly legally estopped pursuant to: Carmine v. Bowen, 64 A. 932, 1906, silence activates estoppel.
I, Your Name Here, hereby reserve the right to amend this document, and am the only party authorized to assert the right to make amendments to this document as necessary, and in order that the truth may be ascertained and these proceedings justly determined.
Should any party possess information that will controvert and overcome this Declaration with specificity, please advise Me in writing by DECLARATION in AFFIDAVIT FORM within 30, days from receipt hereof and thereby, provide Me with your timely rebuttle, proving with particularity by stating all requisite actual evidentiary fact and all requisite actual law, and at no time in reliance on mere presumptive facts and personal conclusions law, that this Affidavit by Verified Declaration is substantially and materially false sufficiently for changing materially my declaration.
The Undersigned, I, Your Name Here, do herewith declare, state and say that I, Your Name Here, issue this with sincere intent in truth, that I, the undersigned am competent by stating the matters set forth herein, that the contents are true, correct, complete, and certain, admissible as evidence, reasonable, not misleading, and by My best knowledge, by Me, the undersigned.
This document and all others pertaining to this issue may be recorded and thusly may be used at the discretion of its issuer for any and all matters as so allowed under Rule 902 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and others, including, without limitations, the jurisdiction of the State of Arizona and the United States of America.
By my hand, this sixth day of November, 2007, Your Name Here.
Signed: _____________________________________,
All Rights Reserved
Your Name Here
c/o 1234 W. Freedom Way
Phoenix, Arizona republic
near [85000]
Arizona state Republic )
) ss. JURAT
Maricopa County )
On the ___ day of ________, 200__, Your Name Here personally appeared before me and proved to me on the basis of satisfactory evidence to be the person whose name is subscribed hereto and acknowledged to me that he executed the same under asseveration, and accepts the facts thereof. Subscribed and affirmed before me this day. Witness my hand and seal this ____ day of __________, 200__.
Notary Signature
My Commission expires on the ____ day of ____________, 20____.
Affidavit is 2 pages Exhibit is 16 pages Document number 2
certified mail number 7007 0710 0003 8330 1234
Exhibit
INTERNAL REVENUE TAX AND AUDIT SERVICE (IRS)
For Profit General Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 7/12/33
File No. 0325720
FEDERAL RESERVE ASSOCIATION (Federal Reserve)
Non-profit Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 9/13/14
File No. 0042817
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AUTHORITY INC. (CIA)
For Profit General Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 3/9/83
File No. 2004409
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INC.
Non-profit Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 4/19/89
File No. 2193946
FEDERAL LAND ACQUISITION CORP.
For-profit General Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date 8/22/80
File No. 0897960
RTC COMMERCIAL ASSETS TRUST 1995-NP3-2
For-profit Delaware Statutory Trust
Incorporation Date 10/24/95
File No. 2554768
SOCIAL SECURITY CORP, DEPT. OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE
For-Profit General Delaware Corporation
Incorporation Date: 11/13/89
File No. 2213135
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
4
A new concept that might be worth studying:
Following are 4 concepts that when studied together may be an important part of the puzzle that have been recently discovered.
1) Nihil dicit judgement: This court order is actually higher than a default judgement and leaves no room for an appeal.
2) There is no accusation in civil court, therefore the word charge is synonymous with the word bill in civil court.
3) The IRS is a debt collection service.
4) Debt collection is covered under Title 15 chapter 4 sub-chapter V section 1692, not Title 26.
Combining all of these facts into one concept creates a heretofore unused defense that appears to be valid.
When the IRS charges someone with willful failure to file under civil law they are really billing the victim. The victim then tries to fight using the Constitution and/or Title 26 without ever really requesting a verified assessment of the debt under Title 15,which gives the IRS the ability to be granted a nihil dicit judgement against the victim in UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, making the bill lawful. Once the bill is deemed lawful the IRS gets to claim the victim is fraudulently refusing to pay a legal debt and therefore converts the refusal to pay into some kind of criminal act.
In reality, since the IRS is nothing more than a debt collection service the victim can demand the IRS to verify the assessment, which the IIRS can’t, and if the IRS could, the victim can make the IRS take the action to the jurisdictional district the alleged debtor is in.
These are all recent discoveries and have been used minimally, yet separately. I am attempting to combine all 4 into one complete concept in a way the average man can use as a defense against the terrorist.
I am getting a lot of calls and e-mails on Title 15 so I will try to explain our concept again. Use this with the previous explanation and people interested should understand the concept with very little research.
The first rule of winning in court is to win before court. The second rule is to make the other party argue about something other than the case at hand. IRS attorneys know this, so should we.
Going to court and arguing about taxes using Title 26 is ineffective for the following reasons.
1) Title 26 is used by the government to determine the tax. see Title 26
2) The IRS is a debt collection service, not a government agency. see Diversified Metal v. T-Bow trust/IRS
3) The bill issued by the U.S. TREASURY (under Title 26) becomes a debt collected by the IRS (which has to follow Title 15).
4) If you fight the IRS under Title 26, you are fighting something they have nothing to do with. It is like contesting the electric bill to the mail man, he will just think you are a nag and he can’t do anything about it anyhow.
5) The bill has already been adjudicated under nihil dicit judgement and stands if not contested under Title 15. You can not contest the bill under Title 26 since that is the government code on how to figure the bill, not the bill itself.
6) Demanding the IRS verify the assessment (read as bill) requires them to cease and desist (under Title 15) until the supply the docs.
7) The IRS can not supply the requisite docs and therefore you have beat them before court. see rule 1
8) If you go to court you can argue the correct issue, the bill, not how they determined the bill, thusly you can win by arguing the right argument. see rule 2
9) You can force the IRS to do the action in the judicial district, ie the court nearest the debtor, which they will not do, and therefore you won’t go to court. see YHWH’s scriptures.
a) See; TITLE 26 > Subtitle F > CHAPTER 76 > Subchapter A > § 7408
§ 7408. Actions to enjoin specified conduct related to tax shelters and reportable transactions
(d) Citizens and residents outside the United States
If any citizen or resident of the United States does not reside in, and does not have his principal place of business in, any United States judicial district, such citizen or resident shall be treated for purposes of this section as residing in the District of Columbia.
I know this seems over simplified, but a cursory study of unsuccessful IRS litigation against their victims will lead one to determine that one of the common denominators of acquittals is that somewhere or somehow the victim did some type of assessment request that was never affirmed. This is diametrically opposed to all the victims that lost using Title 26 and the absence of applicability to the code.
In summary, just like a charge in a traffic ticket, don’t fight the law and their reasoning, deny the bill and require them to prove it exists as a matter of record, before they make it a matter of record under nihil dicit judgement because you didn’t deny it.
Example:
A contractOR (government under Title 26) issues you (contractEE) a bill through their third party collection service (IRS), you do not respond. Third party collector service, whose actions and remedies are defined in Title 15, goes to court ex-parte and receives a nihil dicit judgement. You get dragged into a foreign court (USDC) and attempt to fight the contractOR and their rules for issuing the bill under the Constitution and/or Title 26, neither of which applies, since it is the bill being discussed not the entity that issued the bill or how said entity determined the amount. Any attorney would tell you this is a waste of time. You (contractEE) must first void the bill under the appropriate code (Title 15) and demand the case be kept in the proper jurisdiction (nearest judicial district).
In essence, Title 26 applies to the government entity that determined the bill and Title 15 applies to the collection agency attacking you for payment. Its almost incomprehensible to believe that legally Title 26, THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE has little to do with the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. This appears to be a well orchestrated word trick.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
5
Here is the silver bullet, check it out.
Title 26 has nothing to do with the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE; it only applies to THE INTERNAL REVENUE.
The give away is in Title 26 section 7802 (b)(1)(c)
7802 INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE OVERSIGHT BOARD
(b)(1)(c) one member shall be the Commissioner of the Internal Revenue.
Hence, The Internal Revue Code not The Internal Revenue Service Code.
The Internal Revenue and the Internal Revenue Service are two separate and distinct entities.
The Internal Revenue is a government agency and is under the scope of Title 26.
Internal Revenue Service is a private for Profit Corporation and is under the scope of Title 15.
If you look up Internal Revenue Service in the Index of Title 26 you will discover it is only mentioned in a few sections. None of which have anything to do with determining the tax, they only deal with governance, collection and the like.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
6
The following contains a complete reference from Title 26 detailing the distinctions between INTERNAL REVENUE and INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE. INTERNAL REVENUE deals with taxes on liquor, tobacco and firearms. INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE deals with the collection of assessed taxes for the TREASURY and the INTERNAL REVENUE.
This concludes my cursory study of the distinctions. After reading the following listed sections I believe you all will agree with my conclusion that Title 26 does not apply to controversies dealing with the ability of the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE to collect taxes.
6404
7214-7217
7516-7517
7521
7608
7622
7624
7802-7808
7802 especially (b)(1)(c)
7803 especially (1)(A)
7806 especially (b)
Nowhere in Title 26 is it stated that the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE has anything to do with assessing taxes, that is done by either the TREASURY or INTERNAL REVENUE. The distinctions between the two are far too numerous to accept as a scribners error. The intent becomes obvious while reading the aforementioned sections.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
7
After all the studying I have done on this recent discovery about the THE INTERNAL REVENUE V. THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, something just dawned on me that seems to be missing from Title 26. So here I am at 3 am going through the book from cover to cover and it is nowhere to be found. I get a lot of letters and docs from various agents of the IRS and their assorted cohorts and it is always there, but it is not on any of my copies of Title 26.
I have always hated seeing that satanic looking symbol and it usually makes me cringe more than the stupid wording underneath it. Its their logo, some kind of Nazi looking dead eagle. Its everywhere on INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE crap, but it is nowhere to be found in or on the Title 26 book.
Understanding the laws concerning copyrights and trademarks makes me consider this as prima facie evidence my theory is correct. If Title 26 was part of THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE that logo would be all over the place. The reason it is not is because that would invalidate the logo since it would be used to commit an act of fraud.
This may not seem like a big deal but it would be like McDonalds not putting its GOLDEN ARCHES on its packaging.
Study points:
court
nihil dicit judgement
Title 26
IRS logo not on Title 26 book
section 7802 (b)(1)(c)
IRS incorporated in 1933 long after INTERNAL REVENUE already operating
Diversified Metal v. T-Bow Trust / IRS
IR assesses and IRS collects
Title 15 Chapter 41 Sub V section 1692
verified assessment
judicial district
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
8
50 Titles and not one is about private corporations
· Title 1 General Provisions
· Title 2 The Congress
· Title 3 The President
· Title 4 Flag and Seal, Seat Of Government,and the States
· Title 5 Government Organization and Employees
· Appendix to Title 5
· Title 6 Domestic Security
· Title 7 Agriculture
· Title 8 Aliens and Nationality
· Title 9 Arbitration Title 10 Armed Forces
· Appendix to Title 10 (Rules of Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces)
· Title 11 Bankruptcy
· Appendix to Title 11
· Title 12 Banks and Banking
· Title 13 Census
· Title 14 Coast Guard
· Title 15 Commerce and Trade
· Title 16 Conservation
· Title 17 Copyrights
· Title 18 Crimes and Criminal Procedure
· Appendix to Title 18
· Title 19 Customs Duties
· Title 20 Education
· Title 21 Food and Drugs
· Title 22 Foreign Relations and Intercourse
· Title 23 Highways
· Title 24 Hospitals and Asylums
· Title 25 Indians
· Title 26 Internal Revenue Code
· Appendix to Title 26
· Title 27 Intoxicating Liquors
· Title 28 Judiciary and Judicial Procedure
· Appendix to Title 28
· Title 29 Labor
· Title 30 Mineral Lands and Mining
· Title 31 Money and Finance
· Title 32 National Guard
· Title 33 Navigation and Navigable Waters
· Title 34 Navy (repealed)
· Title 35 Patents
· Title 36 Patriotic Societies and Observances
· Title 37 Pay and Allowances Of the Uniformed Services
· Title 38 Veterans’ Benefits
· Appendix to Title 38 (Rules of Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims()
· Title 39 Postal Service
· Title 40 Public Buildings, Property, and Works
· Title 41 Public Contracts
· Title 42 The Public Health and Welfare
· Title 43 Public Lands
· Title 44 Public Printing and Documents
· Title 45 Railroads
· Title 46 Shipping
· Appendix to Title 46
· Title 47 Telegraphs, Telephones, and Radiotelegraphs
· Title 48 Territories and Insular Possessions
· Title 49 Transportation
· Title 50 War and National Defense
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
9
How it works.
THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE gives you their docs that you fill out, or they fill out. They then give the docs to THE INTERNAL REVENUE which says, “oh look this guy owes us this money”. THE INTERNAL REVENUE then gets a nihil dicit judgement making the debt valid and turns the bill over to the INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, a private for profit collection agency, for collection. You then fight THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE on the validity, which was already covertly adjudicated, under Title 26. The judge considers you insane since he knows Title 26 has nothing to do with THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and ONLY concerns itself with THE INTERNAL REVENUE. Which would be like taking something you bought at WALMART back to KMART.
This is also exactly what ALL other debt collection companies due for their vendors.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Lectlaw: JUDGMENT BY NIL DICIT, is one rendered against a defendant for want of a plea. The plaintiff obtains a rule on the defendant to plead within a time specified, of which he serves a notice on the defendant or his attorney; if the defendant neglect to enter a plea within the time specified, the plaintiff may sign judgment against him.
law-dictionary.org: NIHIL DICIT. He says nothing. It is the failing of the defendant to put in a plea or answer to the plaintiff’s declaration by the day assigned; and in plea or answer to the plaintiff’s declaration by the day assigned; and in this case judgment is given against the defendant of course, as he says this case judgment is given against the defendant of course, as he says nothing why it should not. Vide 15 Vin. Ab. 556; Dane’s Ab. Index, h.t. nothing why it should not. Vide 15 Vin. Ab. 556; Dane’s Ab. Index, h.t.
Research.lawyers.com Nihil-dicit judgement: a judgment entered against a defendant who has failed to make an effective answer (as because the answer is withdrawn or does not respond to the merits of the plaintiff’s case)
Black’s Law Dictionary, Sixth Edition, page 1045 Nihil Dicit. He says nothing. The name of the judgment which may be taken as of course against a defendant who omits to plead or answer the plaintiff’s declaration or complaint within the time limited. In some jurisdictions it is otherwise known as judgment “for want of a plea”.
Judgment taken against party who withdraws his answer is judgment nihil dicit, which amounts to confession of cause of action stated, and carries with it, more strongly than judgment by default, admission of justice of plaintiff’s case. See also Nil dicit judgment
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
10
Just for information:
November 5 , 2007 was the day that some guy, through a serious of rather bizarre discoveries and epiphanies made a great discovery, really YHWH slapped some sense into this guy. That discovery being nothing more than a simple word game; THE INTERNAL REVENUE and THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE are two distinct and separate entities.
When all the lawyers decide to quit defending their education and their own opinions and open their eyes to the simple fact that Title 26 has nothing at all to do with THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE and from its very beginning the confusion was purposeful and done with malice aforethought.
I have received so many reports from all other the country from people who now know why the IRS is leaving them alone. These people, some by accident and some on purpose required the IRS to verify the assessment, some with and some without mentioning Title 15. Regardless, once these people demanded the verification the IRS went away.
My advice to everyone is to treat the IRS like it is what it is, a private debt collector. None of us would use Title 26 to argue against a credit card company’s collector service and in all reality that is all the IRS is. Their incorporation documents confirm this.
Don’t forget, there is no accusation in civil court, charge in civil law means bill, nothing else. Treat a bill as a bill.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
11
This might clear things up, but if you have no background in law it might be more confusing. Read it until you understand it. When you do understand it you will be able to follow their road map to destruction, or get off the path. It might help to go down and read the summary first if you have no background in law.
THE INTERNAL REVENUE (IR) deals with the THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE (IRS) under Administrative law (E). This allows the 2 separate entities to communicate privately and off the record. They can also do financial dealings without reporting to the court or the other parties. It also keeps those pesky human and Constitutional rights out of the case since Administrative law (E) is under the executive branch and not the legislative branch.
The IRS deals with a person’s strawman under Administrative law (E). We want them to deal with us under Private law (B), which will cause them to name and hold accountable the actual human being that is attacking you, but they created the strawman so they would not have to. As long as you use Title 26 which is under Administrative law (E) you are treated as a corporation (corporation don’t have human or Constitutional rights). When you invoke Title 15, which deals with natural persons (which do have human and Constitutional rights) the IRS loses authority because they will now be treated by the court as what they are, a private for Profit Corporation. Under Private law you can deal directly with the human, and his real name, that is attacking you rather than the whole corporation. By dealing with the IRS under Administrative law (E), you can not invoke the natural person concept since it is not included in its definitions. Also, since Administrative law (E) is part of Public law (A), any conviction can be moved to another section of Public law (A) called Criminal law (F). But, when dealing with the IRS under Title 15 you are considered a natural person and can invoke Constitutional law (D) if they try to violate your rights. Remember, the IRS agents use pseudonyms to keep us from going into Private law (B). A good rule to follow is if the IRS is trying to stop it, you should try and start it. Private law (B) can not be moved to Criminal law (F) since they are under different legal concepts.
Summary This is very, very important: If you invoke Title 26 you stay under Administrative law (E) and you can not use Constitutional and/or human rights as your defense since they do not exist in Administrative law (E), which is for corporations. The RS has the authority under Administrative law (E) to move the proceedings to Criminal law (F) since both laws are relegated under Public law (A). If you invoke Title 15 you have moved over to private law (B) and are to be considered a natural person, human being, and have Constitutional rights. Plus the IRS can not move a case form Private law which is its own entity to Criminal law (F) since that is under Public law (A).
Definitions of laws:
In general terms, public law involves interrelations between the state and the general population, whereas private law involves interactions between private citizens. Generally speaking, private law is the area of law in a society that affects the relationships between individuals or groups without the intervention of the state or government. In many cases the public/private law distinction is confounded by laws that regulate private relations while having been passed by legislative enactment. In some cases these public statutes are known as laws of public order, as private individuals do not have the right to break them and any attempt to circumvent such laws is void as against public policy.
A) Public law is the law governing the relationship between individuals (citizens, companies) and the state. Constitutional law, administrative law and criminal law are sub-divisions of public law.
B) Private law is that part of a legal system which is part of the jus commune that involves relationships between individuals, such as the law of contracts or torts, as it is called in the common law, and the law of obligations as it is called in civilian legal systems. It is to be distinguished from public law, which deals with relationships between natural and artificial persons (i.e., individuals, business entities, non-profit organizations) and the state including regulatory statutes, penal law and other law that effects the public order.
C) Corporate law refers to the law establishing separate legal entities known as the company or corporation and governs the most prevalent legal models for firms, for instance limited companies Technically, a company is a juristic person which has a separate legal identity from its shareholding members, and is ordinarily incorporated to undertake commercial business.
D) Constitutional law deals with the relationship between the state and individual, and the relationships between different branches of the state, such as the executive, the legislative and the judiciary.
E) Administrative law refers to the body of law which regulates bureaucratic managerial procedures and is administered by the executive branch of a government and to the body of law that defines the powers of administrative agencies; rather than the judicial or legislative branches (if they are different in that particular jurisdiction). This body of law regulates international trade, manufacturing, pollution, taxation, and the like. Also called regulatory law, it is the body of law that arises from the activities of administrative agencies of government. Government agency action can include rulemaking, adjudication, or the enforcement of a specific regulatory agenda. Administrative law is considered a branch of public law. Administrative law expanded greatly during the twentieth century.
F) Criminal law involves the state imposing sanctions for crimes committed by individuals so that society can achieve justice and a peaceable social order. This differs from Civil law in that civil actions are disputes between two parties that are not of significant public concern.
Au Matu said:
Reblogged this on aumatu and commented:
Just in Time…
Paul Joseph, Luiso said:
This is VERY enlightening. Being new to the site, I was wondering… do you have anything I can use against the California FTB? They are trying to levy me. Thanks, Paul
dbhj said:
Hi Paul,
I assume FTB is a taxing authority. Check the statutes, at the bottom of the statute is an authorization code, if it is in brackets it has been omitted. Most statutes are private for profit, if this is the case, see Frank Austin England III’s post https://keystoliberty2.wordpress.com/2012/03/22/oregon-department-of-re-venue-letter-part-1/ and part 2. Such things can work, best of luck. ~ Denise
Greg said:
Disregard my reply from pt.1, obviously found the rest of it. Great information Thank you.
Marie said:
Remember that the Franchise Tax Board relies upon the FEDERAL 1040 adjusted gross income amount. Take the head off the beast by decimating the AGI and the rest of the body (FTB) will fall. ALL states that have income tax “requirements” rely on the AGI for the assessment. Dispute the claim first; next step I seriously recommend reading Cracking the Code (see losthorizons.com) and then send the FTB an AMENDED return.
Denise, I prepared a letter for my parent a few months ago and only included elements of Title 15 debt validation w/o specific reference to Title 15. No response was received. A second letter from a different “campus” was sent out a month later w/a different amount. We responded with a copy of the above and gave them a 30-day deadline this time. The IRS is chasing its tail as a result! This WORKS and WORKS WELL!! Haven’t provided ANYTHING – because it can’t. IF it had anything to back up the claim, how hard is it to produce the requested items with a few computer keystrokes and a photocopier?? My parent periodically receives a form letter from them saying “we’re working on your request. Meanwhile if you owe, it is suggested you pay now to avoid penalties and interest.” LOL! We’ve submitted an amended return wherein a REFUND is due. Wished I had known about this before to put a cold stop to prior extortion payments made by the parent.
dbhj said:
Hi Marie,
A breath of fresh air, and I appreciate it. Americans have forgotten how to stand up for their rights and I am delighted that you helped your parent out. ~ Denise
Keith said:
Discharge the Debt
Californian said:
Why would the FTB levy someone? Usually, because you didn’t pay them correct.
If you stop filing and information returns are filed against you, you have to rebut them.
ok, you are about to be levied. You have no spare dollars to pay? Then send a letter to the MAN OR WOMAN who runs the FTB.
Dear,
At this time due to my finances I have no spare dollars. Is there anything else of value you will accept from me? What are they going to do, take your spare dollars and cause you harm? Say no, we will not accept any value but dollars? No, you can’t come mow the lawn or work for us. No, you can’t pick up trash along the roads. We want to harm you and take your dollars.
Write the man or woman that letter 3 times, make them say no. Put them on the defense.
Ken
Californian said:
I commented on the site already, but wanted all to know the progress. The IRS sent the notice of levy when I used the letter and referred to 15 USC 1692 (g). They DID NOT LEVY! As a matter of fact they apologized for any inconvenience they caused.
They asked for 45 days to review my letter asking them to validate the debt. They sent another letter 80 days later asking for 45 more days and as Marie stated above, oh and you can pay us if you like. LOL.
I think they have dishonored themselves by going past 45 days. I should have realized they are fishing and if I keep the letter. The letter belongs to them. I am on the hook. I took more than 3 days.
So I said I would give them 45 more days on condition only that they validate the debt per 15 USC 1692(g) or discharge the debt.
I’ll keep everyone posted as a lot of times we share some info and do not follow thru for others to follow.
eowyndbh said:
Thank you for posting your results ~ Denise
Joe Skelton said:
I was hounded by the IRS for months with all kinds of threatening letters. I replied to all of them with Title 15 and more. At last , I sent them a letter threatening to sue them for copyright infringement. I have not heard from them since. I do not know what caused them to stop Title 15 or copyright infringement.
I did record the reservation of rights letter into public and also sent copies to three US Judges and the US ATTORNEY GENERAL. This could be the very thing that did the trick, I don’t know for sure. I would suggest to all to never give up. We can use their laws against them to defeat them. GOD BLESS
eowyndbh said:
Hi Joe, Nice to hear of your success. I placed a copyright on my tradename/trademark and it keeps the state courts away. On income tax, I gave up my U.S. citizenship several years ago. ~ dee
Richard Heidelberg said:
So what happened?
Richard
divinemichael said:
so all i have to do is send them a letter referring to title 15 usc 1692, and i have been putting tax exempt on my w2 , and does anbody have the address to send to , i only ask this because there are several address’s i just want to send to the right one , and all of the letters i have been getting are automated one they are not signed by anyone
eowyndbh said:
Hi Michael,
Check in the Code of Federal Regulations as well, you will find [ ] brackets, meaning it can be unilateral enforced, but because it has been omitted according the U.S. Government Printing Style Manual. I would sent that along with 15 usc 1692 to make them prove anything.
Californian said:
Hi Michael,
So you mean tax exempt on your W4? Then your employer won’t take out taxes?
If you do that, MAKE SURE on your W4, you sign “without prejudice” this does mean you are not giving up your rights or privileges.
YOU MUST cancel your voter registration and NEVER go to jury duty. ONLY US citizens can vote and perform jury duty.
Redo do your SSN SS-5 form and sign as the Agent and write “without prejudice” same with your DMV drivers license.
YOU MUST close your bank accounts and reopen them and sign “without prejudice”. The 1st place they look to see if you are a US citizen would be a bank account. Then your drivers lic. then check to see if you’re registered to vote. Everything we sign, we sign as US citizens. SO start over again and reserve your rights as a free Citizen, or free Inhabitant. See dec of indep.
If you do send a 1040, again sign without prejudice.
Michael, you really can’t prove you are tax exempt. Never say I am tax exempt or I don’t owe that. or I am not a US citizen. Or that’s unconstitutional. You must always just say prove I am this or that. Like; show how I was made liable to pay taxes, for example.
Maybe say;
Prove I am a US citizen made liable.
Prove I am not tax exempt.
Provide me your oath of office to uphold and protect John Doe rights at all times.
Provide me your regulatory authority and delegated authority to address John Doe.
Provide me certified copies of all documents/proofs of service you are reviewing related to this matter.
Provide me a validation of debt for Tax year 2012, ending 12-31-12, or ask them to set-off/discharge the debt. for JOHN DOE ACCNT [SSN] 123121234 payable at US Treasury Dept. If you don’t close out the account, they will keep sending letters. They will come from different locations. Some letters will start to refer to an IRS Agent, but they won’t sign the letter. So then ask that Agent to prove he has authority to speak with John Doe.
You never want to create controversy and always try to close the account by charging to JOHN DOE ACCNT NO. 123121234
1st thing you always do on your letters to the IRS, say I am not JOHN DOE, I am John Doe, live breathing soul. They don’t relate to live souls and live souls have Rights. Don’t act as the accommodating party for JOHN DOE.
PLEASE DON’T REFER TO 15 USC 1692g, JUST ASK FOR A VALIDATION OF DEBT. only US citizens can refer to their codes, I think so anyway. Just to be on the safe side.
If you signed a 1040 without reserving your rights, you may have an issue at some point. So that is why I say ask them to set-off or charge to JOHN DOE add the SSN number, say ACCNT NO 123121234 payable at US Treasury Dept. This way you are seen as not in dishonor. Dishonor will get you in trouble.
I hope this helps you Michael.
You might send the letter to:
IRS Internal Revenue Service
PO Box 9012
Holtsville, New York 11742-9012
divinemichael said:
thank you for all the information , i did change my w4 back to normal before i started work ,this was the first time i did , and em thankful ou got back to me i see i have to do alot of steps before i claim exempt , i just have a letter from tax year 2011 saying that i owe , so would i write the letter to them as you stated above , and dont refer to title 15 just validation of debt , do i sign the letter more then likely not right , and do i at the end of the letter say this —–So that is why I say ask them to set-off or charge to JOHN DOE add the SSN number, say ACCNT NO 123121234 payable at US Treasury Dept. This way you are seen as not in dishonor. and i am not sure what the account # is and do i send along with my letter the automated letter they sent me thank you ❤
divinemichael said:
do i give up my us ciitzenship and does that effect me getting a passport , doing all the starting over with my driver licence , ss # voting
Californian said:
Hi Michael, of course I am not giving you legal advice. By now I am sure you understand that, as well as Attorneys are not on your side. You have to learn to be your own counsel. As no one can coach you along to be free. It takes the desire to re-train the way you think.
It takes hundreds of hours. I didn’t even grasp all this until over a thousand hours of reading. I DO NOT FEEL AS THOUGH YOU HAVE TO SUFFER or spend as much time as I have. As most of us are so busy living our lives. SO I DON’T mind helping you. As a matter of fact, anyone who wants to charge for all their time doing this should not do so. If we don’t teach each other to be free, then this Union will continue to fall.
The public school system teaches us to be slaves. I want to teach you to be free, free of charge. However, only you can be free. it’s easy to write a letter as you have time to ask for help. But if you are asked by the powers to be (PTB) to prove who you are not. If you are cornered by them, you BETTER BE ABLE TO DEFEND YOURSELF BY MEMORY or you will go to jail.
You have to KNOW your Rights. You have to KNOW where your Rights come from. You have to speak as an unenfranchised free inhabitant.
You do NOT have to give up your US citizenship. Don’t believe anyone who tells you to expatriate. Your TOKEN, your NAME in all CAPS to play the GAME OF COMMERCE is your US citizen. You need your TOKEN so you can live. Take their benefits if they will give them to you. You paid for them anyway. Your birth Cert printed on a bond is proof enough that your benefits are prepaid. So take the benefits, but sign everything without prejudice.
I now prefer NOT to refer to their codes, just ask for a validation of debt for tax year ending 2011.
When you refer to them and remember they WILL NOT give up on you, especially if you are worth it. Always say you are not JOHN but John the agent for JOHN.
If you have your first letter, just keep it simple for now. And never dishonor or create controversy. Always be seen as willing to pay. Always respond with conditions.
Please provide a validation of debt for tax year ending 2011. After the validation is provided, I will pay whatever I lawfully owe.
“All my Inalienable Rights are reserved as a living breathing man domiciled on the Republic of YOUR STATE without prejudice/without recourse”
___________________________________Date________
By John Doe-Authorized Agent
They will send letters from different locations until they trip you up.
When they finally send you a letter with an agents name, then ask them to set-off the amount owing.
Californian said:
BTW, I never send the letters certified return receipt. They don’t play games that way. The USPS does just fine. But it’s up to you how to send the letter. And do it fast. But don’t worry if you didn’t, as I 1st paid a payment, then they sent a letter saying ok, pay payments. Then I didn’t have the money to pay. SO then they sent a letter that scared me. A Notice to Levy. They dont mess around. SO it didnt ask them to cease and validate until the Notice to Levy.
Then they sent a very nice letter and apologized to me for any inconvenience they may have caused me. They are scared to. They must collect or lose their jobs.
So you can see I ignored them and really screwed up and they still stopped the Levy with a simple letter.
I believe they gave us remedy in the set-off. The TOKEN has to have a way to pay. We can pay with our cash or the TOKEN can pay. The TOKEN is the player. The player has an account to play the game. Why do you think the utility companies want your SSN number. They want access to your account as collateral. the TOKEN can pay or you can pay.
SAME with the IRS, you can pay or the TOKEN can pay. BUT YOU MUST MAKE SURE THEY GET PAID.
We just don’t know that. SO we pay to play the game WITH OUR CASH.
divinemichael said:
than you for all your help , and i have said to them on the phone tring to get a name and not just a last name and badge # , they ask me if i am the tax payer on the notice i said no thats not how i spell my name its in all caps , i said this letter is not signed by anyone so who em i to respond to , they did give me a full name at the end
i dont know if this makes me feel any better what you wrote , or just make makes me more angry
Californian said:
I assume the IRS agents are under some directive to collect or else. As most Americans are tricked into thinking the IRS is constitutional, that makes their job easy until those that challenge them that is.
I would not recommend speaking with them as they are most likely trained to hook you back into being the taxpayer. It’s not worth the risk.
I am only myself just standing up to them. So this is all new to me. I can only share with what I have done so far which I have explained in detail.
Please don’t get mad or upset at the IRS agents, as they are just doing what they think is their jobs, as they have families to feed as well. It’s not worth allowing them to control how we feel.
I have read over a thousand hours. My conclusion and yours may be different somewhat as another free persons conclusion may be described a tad different. I just like to use the term TOKEN. You can say STRAWMAN or whatever you like.
After all my research, including the local law library, I feel strongly that when they took our gold and replaced that with our full faith and CREDIT. Our birth certs became our remedy and collateral to play the game of COMMERCE. They have to be like blocks of gold in Fort Knox. On deposit there for the U.S. Corp govt to use to print money.
And also as remedy for the TOKEN to use as a way to get CREDIT into circulation as well as pay off taxes.
So far I was about to be levied. I stopped them cold with the validation of debt. I have never spoken to anyone and all the do is send me new letters asking for more time. I have just requested them to simply charge the tax bill to my TOKEN/STRAWMAN. I just did that. When I hear from them next, I will share here, what happened.
eowyndbh said:
Thanks for the feed back, but I think you will find there is no gold in Fort Knox. ~ Denise
divinemichael said:
and why do i have to play with them anyway
divinemichael said:
if majority rules , and the majority of people dont want to pay taxes or anthing else for that matter then why does the majority submit , i get tired of people complaing and bitching just no one wants to band together and say fuck you , i cant stand dealing with this shit, all it does is bring the hate out in me
Californian said:
For the record, I never started out to be free so I could learn not to pay taxes. I just discovered that the IRS wasn’t a constitutional agency along the way. Now I am just trying to learn to play the game of COMMERCE AND RESERVE ALL MY RIGHTS AS I DO IT SO I DON’T GET TRICKED INTO A BAD SITUATION.
If someone hates to pay taxes uses sites like this just to get out of taxes is a real shame. Because learning to be free is more important than learning how not to pay taxes.
eowyndbh said:
I’d agree with you, but along the way you figure out how to get out of the taxes. ~ Denise
Californian said:
Denise, you’re spot on. The truth sure seems to reveal itself while you read and read and read. The IRS is Internal for a reason and limited to their jurisdiction. To continue to pay them after you know the truth and can defend yourself, would be to perpetuate the fraud.
I seen a recent video of a mountain type man caught for fishing without a license. He was very learned about their codes and supreme court cases and tried so hard to convince the judge he was a living man. I felt bad for the man because he had so much passion.
If only he knew the Supreme court cases are for US citizens as well as the codes. He sounded like a US citizen, used their laws and ultimately lost his case.
He was so close to being a freeman. I am however convinced not to mention their codes to them. Not to speak of supreme court cases of any kind.
We should always make them prove we are US citizens made liable. That goes for the IRS as well as a fishing without a license ticket.
If the IRS can not prove we are made liable, then we can hopefully avoid being ruined by them.
Ken
David said:
I have a question. Can Title 15 §1692 and this same type of debt validation be used against state taxing agencies that send you tax bills for your house, boat, car, airplane, etc? Does this all still apply? I dont see why it wouldn’t but just wanted to ask. Those agencies have no way to validate a tax assessment on any of those items, but they arent collection agencies trying to collect either. They are the original “debt holders” that are trying to collect. Any insight on this would be helpful. Thanks
Californian said:
David, I am not giving legal advice, but I myself have only used 15 USC 1692 with the IRS, with success. Remember, never create controversy. Always be willing to pay with conditions. Otherwise, you will lose.
You must also understand, if you are a US citizen or citizen of the United States, you are obligated to pay local, state and federal taxes. Including state and property taxes.
ESPECIALLY, David, if you are registered to vote! IF you are registered to vote, then just pay your taxes as you promised to pay by registering.
Only free inhabitants are free and independent, look at your state constitution under declaration of rights. You will find that natural born state citizens are free and promised a republican form of government. But not, if you register to vote, beg for a drivers license or fill out 1040 forms. Now, you can remedy all that with RESERVING YOUR RIGHTS. As you can contract them away. But can get them back instantly with a reservation of rights. Because the Declaration of Independence declares your rights inalienable. WHich can not be taken or give away by you. So reserve only your inalienable rights.
CANCEL your voter registration for starters, you are not a taxpayer or voter. ALways make them prove who you are. Never tell them you are not something. Ask them to provide a validation of the debt (the actual accounting); verification of their claim against you, just a signed invoice; and a copy of the contract binding both parties.
Write as soon as I received these three documents, I would be happy to pay any
financial obligation I might lawfully owe.
Regarding credit cards, ask for:
1. Full Disclosure
2. Equal Consideration
3. Lawful Terms and Conditions
4. Signatures of the Parties
Regarding property taxes, read the court case; MEMPHIS BANK & TRUST COMPANY, APPELLANT v. RILEY C. GARNER, ET AL. 1982
This is very deep and complicated, but when we stopped using the gold to back our money, the states could no longer ask you to pay in gold or silver.
See the Constitution at Art 1 sec. 10 You can’t tender anything but gold or silver to an officer of the state government without being a party to a felony.
How do they now figure taxes? even income taxes? based on obligations of the federal government. WHat obligations, federal reserve notes. They shall be exempt from taxation.
They are using FRD indirectly to figure your taxes. WHich is constitution for US citizens, but for free inhabitants.
Again, I am not giving legal advice and that is too deep for me. But you can start your own rabbit hole if you so desire.
Ken
Californian said:
I meant to say they are using FRD indirectly to figure your taxes. Which is constitutional for US citizens, but not for free inhabitants.
David said:
Californian, Thanks you for your reply. Regarding the rabbit hole, I am so far down in it I will never be able to look at our country the same again. I started researching this about a year and a half ago. I read all about the UCC 1-308, taxes, most of the documents listed on this website, went to sedm.org and read through some of their stuff. Then I met “the Colonel”. I have gone way past what I call the passive aggressive defensive approach most of the people take to try to reclaim their freedom, i.e. cancel voter registration card, stop paying taxes, send in paper work from the sedm.org site, etc. Im not saying all of that is bad or that I dont think it works, but instead of sitting back on the defensive and waiting on them to come to me, I have gone on the offensive and sued both the U.S. corp and the State of TN corp for a writ of mandamus to recogize my reservation of rights under the UCC 1-308. I am currently in the middle of the lawsuit awaiting the outcome. By suing them, I am looking them right square in the eye and making them deal with me directly. Not only does this exempt me from the taxes, void my voter registration card, etc, this forces them to accept that I am a real person within a state of the union and not the surety for the ‘token’ that they created on federal territory. This makes me immune to all of the civil (corporate) law that they impose on us and punish us under with monetary and incarceration punishments because they assume we live within the boundaries of the federal territories. Oh I am balls deep in the rabbit hole. Lol. I do know people that have been successful in this approach and they are coaching me and helping. I am waiting on the outcome. I was just curious if this same type of approach could be used on personal property as well as the IRS. Thanks for the reply Californian. Lots of good info.
californian said:
Oh my David, I think you should be teaching me. LOL. I think its most important to know who we are for sure. I actually have not had to speak to a cop for instance.
When I do. I am still not sure how I will handle it. The cop lives in a fairytale and under a spell. He will just do what everyone else does. Reject what I am saying. Its hard to find people to respond to the truth. I was a patriot wasting my time writing letters and calling, rallies, etc. So i took to this pretty easy.
I too will never look at our Union the same. I got rid of every US flag. etc. Put private property/not for hire on my car lic. plt frms. I have stamps made for every occasion regarding reserving my rights.
From what I have so far realized going down all these holes. Reading everyones approach to being free. As there are plenty of ideas. lol. Never heard of the Colonel??? There is no shortage of ideas for sure.
Anyway, for now I am convinced they own our NAME. If they own it. They can pay its damn bills. They gave us remedy, jusy like ucc 1_308. i am also convinced it the birth cert. we have been trained to pay ITS bills, but all along they gave IT a way to pay ITS own way.
I suppose one could play the game or leave the game? I have decided to play the game. I figure they owe me for lying to me. LOL. I have just began and have no idea whats gunna happen.
I was afraid of the IRS and I am worth it. 15k. They were about to levy and I stopped them cold. now they are the ones chasing their tales.
David said:
Very nice. Glad you were able to stop them. I assume all you did was ask for validation of the debt. I actually have been extremely open minded when reading about all of this and I have learned so much. I believe the Republic of the United States still exist, but there are very few that live in it immune to the United States corp rules and regs. If you are not an employee of the corp, they have no more jurisdiction over you to enforce private, corporate rules against you then walmart or publix. Once you understand that, it is extemely easy to find out what need to be done. With the application of the birth certificate, the US corp created a fictitious legal entity, an unincorporated corporation, that you are the surety for through silent and unknown contracts. Once you accept that there are actually two separate versions of you, John Doe and JOHN DOE (which I know you have. Im just speaking in general) it is easy to see that the US corp can only do business with another corp. They can not do business with a human being. The corp owns the legal entity that they created and it only has the rights that they decide they want it to have. Your rights as a human being come from God and are recognized by the Declaration of Independence, Articles of Confederation, and the Constitution for the United States of America, all of which are the organic laws of the United States and from the very basis of every single law on the books today. Everyone gets wrapped up in trying to get away from the ‘strawman’ or trying to gain control of it. Instead they should be working on distinguishing themselves separate from it and use it to your benefit. That is where the UCC 1-308 comes into play. You are distinguished as a living breathing human being separate from the strawman, but you still utilize the strawman to do business and commerce. The only way I know to do this is to go on the offensive and MAKE the courts and the US corp recognize this. Then they go into their system and label your strawman as someone not to be stopped or detained, then you have the option to be the literal ‘freeman’ or to use your strawman whenever you choose to do commerce, both of which are completely immune from corporate rules of the US corp. There is much much more to it and I am sure you already know what I have put. I just put it to add to what you have already posted. I will post the outcome of the suit and help you if you would like in becoming really free. Good day to you and Merry CHRISTmas. God Bless.
Californian said:
We seem to be on the same page David. I agree with everything you said.
As to the IRS, I just said cease and desist and validate the debt.
I was very shocked, because; I heard that you have to respond in 3 days. Another says 30 days. Send everything certified return rcpt. etc.
I had ignored them. Then sent 50.00 on 14k. Then they said ok, pay payments. Thats when I thought I might have a new agreement with them according to the UCC.
They agreed to payments. Thats when I hit them with the validate the debt with regular mail. And they apologized to boot.
God Bless you as well.
Tania Barry said:
So do you need to already have your UCC 1 filed in order to write them?
eowyndbh said:
Hi Tania,
It would be helpful. In my last UCC to add property, I put in a Common Law Copyright on my tradename/ trademark including all variances of spelling, capital, abbreviated, spelled backwards. Unless I give them permission in writing to use it. Using my tradename is an automatic contract. The contract goes into default after tens days and I get the violators, infringers, property after they can not pay $10,000 per use in gold and silver bullion. It is identity theft and a criminal trespass. So if a police officer writes you three citations, without you granting permission in writing, they owe you $30,000 dollars in American mint gold and silver bullion.
Tania Barry said:
So I filed my primary UCC-1 and it was accepted, but my two informational filings were rejected. I thought that was bizarre, since they are just informational. What should I do?
Richard Heidelberg said:
Seems to me there is also another approach. In 2011 a law was passed that now requires any bill before congress must contain a constutional authority statement. Guess what, HR 1, the new tax law has a constutional authority statement. In USC title 26 the authority statement is article I Section 8 clause 1. They now have no subject matter jurisdiction. Americans now have no tax on income liability. Under title 18 IRS clearly commits sedition by not obeying the Constitutional authority statement in USC 26. They lie on their website and in publications that they
Have this authority through the 16th amendment. Another lie. Fraud.
eowyndbh said:
Hi Richard,
End the problem and end U.S. citizenship for paying taxes. Under the Code Of Federal Regulations, all tax codes authorizations are in brackets [ ] meaning they have been omitted. Even “failure to file and pay”. But ending U.S. citizenship is easier. Being a U.S. citizen gives you the right to vote in rigged elections. ~ Denise
kenneth johnson said:
Denise, Hi, this is Ken, the woman who called me son, i caller her mom, told me i was born in California, not once did she say i was a US citizen, she is dead now, who will come to court and swear i am a US citizen? I believe i am people, only people as people are free. I will swear in open court, i am an man and one of the people.
Sir Richard McDonald spoke about people are not persons.
eowyndbh said:
Hi Tania,
what were your informal filings about? Sorry I am answering you really late, and I apologize. ~ Denise
Californian said:
Interesting what I found in 15 USC § 17 : The labor of a human being is not a commodity or article of commerce.
Regarding validation of debt. and notice of levy.
The letter to the IRS to ask for a validation of debt did stop the levy. As you have read above.
They keep sending me letters now from different locations.
So far, Ogden, Kansas. New York and now Ohio. New York office said I need not reply as we are looking into your request.
Hello, I don’t think so. I sent them the same letter.
New York said we will respond in 60 days, no need to reply.
At 30 days in, Ohio, sends a notice of levy. What happen to New York? LOL.
If you look at 26 USC 6331, they can only levy a public office. And they refer to Title 27. 27 USC is A.T.F. They are using 27 USC to scare me into thinking they can levy me. I assume in my IMF file, they have me down as a tobacco farmer I suppose. LOL
It’s been since july now and still fighting off the mail fraud. As, by now it seems they are using the mail to harass me.
David said:
Californian,
I am writing to touch base with you and ask how your battle with the IRS is going? Have they decided to leave you alone or are they still harassing you with mail? Lol. Please give an update. I would very much be interested in finding out how things are going to date. I have no intention of filing this year. Thanks
Your comment is awaiting moderation
Californian said:
Hi David,
I believe I mentioned I got letters from many different locations. Finally to a Mr Tumm, who never responded to me.
Then the whole process started over again. A new notice of levy. I was getting as many as 3 letters at a time and every week. From different locations. Like mail terrorism.
I could hardly keep up. Since the wife was so scared and not on board, I had to give up the fight. I apologize…
I will share something interesting. I sent the 1040 for 2012 in oct. as I always do. And I owed them money. They always send me a notice to pay up in december.
I signed just like this. at arms length/without prejudice. my name, then after my name, agent. As the name/person on the return is not really me.
I have not heard from them. So I am wondering? Are they going to fine me 5000.00 for a frivolous return? Or did they ignore me and treat me as if I didn’t file at all? and then send me a notice we didn’t get your 2012 tax return? or send me a willful failure to file?
On the 2011, 1040 in question, I didn’t sign under reservation of rights. and they were right on it. But this time signed as above, under reservation of rights. I haven’t heard a word.
Now signing under reservation of rights. UCC 1-308. Is supposed to give you remedy to common law? I read a IRS form that said if you sign w/o prej. they will fine you 5000.00.
that’s where I stand at the moment.
Richard Heidelberg said:
File suit under title 15 in you local Court not only to show your liability, but ongoing harrassment. Do you think they will appear?? Search on Thomas Freed for assistance.
eowyndbh said:
Hi Richard,
You bring up an interesting point!!! But in a local court . . . or a federal court? Federal is a bit harder to get into, but it is their statute. If it does not apply to government . . . then who does it apply to? ~ Denise
Richard Heidelberg said:
IRS is nothing more than a collection agency. They fall under title 15. Under title 26 they cannot show subject matter jurisdiction because the 16th amendment does not have an enabling clause. Anyway the 16 amendment is a moot point. HR. I the new tax law was passed with an authorization statement. Guess what that is, article 1 section 8 clause 1. Show me where under the authorization statement that Americans are liable for tax on income or wayes show subject matter jurisdiction and show me liability.
Richard Heidelberg said:
Wages
kenneth johnson said:
Update: I am still signing my 1040 without prejudice at arms length, i never got fined $5000.00, i never been bothered. Last year, i put without prejudice at arms length and forgot to sign, they sent my tax return back for me to sign, i signed it and never heard from them again. I never altered their form in anyway, just added a condition. I have never been audited and if i do, i will remind them, i have no records to show them, i don’t save any records, sure come on over and take a look. Their code reads i shall keep and maintain records and i will remind them, i shall keep, i am not ordered to keep, because then i would be a slave.
David said:
Send me a personal email. I will send you the affidavit I intend to send to them. reb4wd99@ftnsa.neomailbox.ch. It is an offshore account. My wife is just like yours. She is not on board and is scared to death of the IRS. I on the other hand have done plenty of research and know that we are in the right to demand such evidence of a threat, however seems it would take a lawsuit to get them to stop harassing you.
houseofcal said:
So overall, how is Title 15 archilles heel working out for everyone?
eowyndbh said:
Hi David,
It seems to be working out well for people, unless I get spam, I always post replies. ~ Denise
Californian said:
Basically, they did stop the levy. They kept sending letters from different locations. but after 6 mos. they then started to overwhelm me with up to 3 letters a day. they threatened of course the levy again. I had to give up the fight. However, I do believe this process does work. It is imperative that if you do this, never claim to be a taxpayer. Never quote Title 26, this is law for taxpayers only. You can quote title 15, as I believe that T15 is pos. law.
Respond in 72 hours. Also sign your name as an agent to the all cap name on the letters from them. Always sign without prejudice in front or above your name in lower case.
In reality after much more study. Your NAME JOHN H DOE is the taxpayer. John H Doe is the live man. You are simply the Agent or authorized signature. just take a loop and look at the line on your checks. it says authorized signature.
Never claim to be the NAME on your birth certificate. You are only John, not JOHN DOE. Always accept anything the IRS sends you with conditions and refute their unattested claim that you are a taxpayer.
eowyndbh said:
Thanks California,
No never say you are a tax payer and good point on the name.
I went on disability several years ago and had student loans. I would address the loans with my name in all capitol letters (JANE DOE) , as it was addressed, but signed as my own representative in l,ower case (Jane Doe). It worked lie a charm. ~ Denise
Californian said:
Hi Denise. You have my attention. What happen with your student loans. Do you mean they harassed you in some way?
I will say something interesting about the 1040. For 2012 I signed as you just stated as the representative/agent. I owed them money as usual. But I have not heard hide nor hair from them this time. Usually the jump all over me for a bone.
In I think like 2000, I read a memo that some 250 people had submitted 1040’s without prejudice. I am wondering how many 14 years later are catching on. I mean, if more and more of us do this. They are better off ignoring us, rather than test us.
I suspect for years, patriots/taxpayers tried to us the constitution, etc. they all must have been thrown to the wolves.
Thanks to the web and brave souls who survived the patriot idea and discovered they were not US citizen/patriots/taxpayers. We may have a chance to stand up for ourselves now.
I mean, I never knew who I was. Now I know I am a free inhabitant of California.
I have informed many people and hopefully they will too.
The truth is spreading. And this includes young people as well. Not all young people are ruined. They know something is wrong as well.
Ken
eowyndbh said:
Hi Ken,
I was removing the student loans. They never even had me wait the three year period. Everything would arrive “JANE DOE” I would except it, be the authorized agent of JANE DOE, as Jane Doe and sign off on it in the fashion. It became obvious to them that I knew about the strawman that my name in capital letters stood for.~ Dee
houseofcal said:
How exactly do you sign authorized agent for caps name? Also, is signing a 1040 this way better than not signing/submitting a 1040 at all? I know some people (Wesley Snipes for instance) signed their forms with something like not a citizen of Columbia but they got him on perjury or some other charge ’cause he signed it.
eowyndbh said:
First off, on income tax, go to the Code Of Federal Regulations for the IRS and notice at the bottom of all statutes, the authorization code in brackets [ ] then go to Federal Rules of Style http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=2008_style_manual&docid=f:chapter8.pdf
Do you see brackets in there? Yes, and it says In bills, contracts, laws, ect., indicate matters that are to be ‘omitted’. Therefore the statute has been omitted.
I can tell you haven’t read much of Frank Austin England III work, or you would have seen how he used that information. ~ Denise
houseofcal said:
I am familiar with Parallel Tables of Authorities and Rules when dealing with federal statutes required for promulgating each code (44 USC 1505, 5 USC 552 & 553, 26 USC 6001 & 7805a) and so not sure who Frank is and what makes him an subject matter expert. It would be nice if you could be less condescending since we are all on the same team, right?
So if I may ask again, how are you signing off with all caps name? I am curious on what authority/statute/code/law are you going by?
eowyndbh said:
Hi Sorry, but you need to read further posts on this site. As for your question, there is no authority, no statutes or no codes. It comes from an understanding of why all documents arrive (insurance, social security, drivers license, registration, power bills, etc.) in all caps. The government has authority over corporations, and they want your straw man to be a corporation so they have that power over you.
There are lots of ways to let them know you are the authorized signature. You can put two small ‘a’ and circle them before you sign things. In my case the government wanted to here from my authorized agent, so I signed and spelled my name as normal to let them know I was the authorized agent. Check out the videos by Winston Strout on the website. ~ Denise
Kenn said:
I am about to accept a job offer and need some clarity on some things. I have always used a W4T Replacement Form so that no taxes are withheld from my checks. On the form it states on one line SOCIAL SECURITY HERE OR WRITE DECLINE. So I write DECLINE in order for my SS number to not be on file or reported. (This is a form from the IRS).
My question is what about the Welfare part always hold out? If no SS is on company record how can they hold it out?
Is there a form to not have Welfare taken out or held out?
Believe new SS and welfare are connected and they do notify each other.
eowyndbh said:
Hi Kenn,
I don’t know anything about W4T. So I can’t advise ~ Denise
Californian said:
Hi Denise, sorry it took me so long to get back to you. I didn’t notice the email. I have not heard of a W-4T.
If one does not want to have deductions taken from their pay checks. It’s so important to declare your domicile. Otherwise, you are in up to your neck.
No matter what you fill out or sign. W4 or W4T. You should write under duress. This makes the W4 contract voidable by you, but not void.
You should change your SS-5 form to an Alien Allowed to Work. Signed by you as the Agent. As US citizens are federal citizens obligated to pay taxes. You want to be a non resident alien. or NON-TAXPAYER. YOU ARE NOT A TAXPAYER. Taxpayers must pay.
You would then us 1040 NR, non res alien. Do not use 1040 forms.
When you get your W2, rebut it as unattested hearsay. If you add the W2 to your 1040NR, you agree the W2 is correct under oath. Add it, but write on it unattested hearsay. You employer doesn’t swear its correct, so its hearsay.
To properly identify your domicile, never abbreviate your home state, like CA. Say, California. NEVER use a zip code. Just leave that off all govt forms.
Never let the IRS call you a taxpayer, or use a CA or a zip code against you, or they gain jurisdiction.
Ken
eowyndbh said:
I do hope that is working for you Ken. On W-4 I have just put simply, on the questions to eliminate withholding; 1) Did you owe the IRS last year [no}; 2) Do you expect to owe this year [no]. Unfortunately that is how I answered after a term of unemployment, and there fore both answers were true. ~ Denise
Kenn said:
Read the full story on Snipes. He filed one years then filed an amendment on advise of his accountant I believe. The problem is he received 11mil back from the IRS and that was the beginning of his demise! NEVER ASK OR ACCEPT MONEY BACK FROM THE IRS RIGHT OR WRONG! THEY WILL GET YOU!
eowyndbh said:
Hi Kenn,
These days with Obama care, don’t file. ~ Denise
john said:
new to this so go easy on me…what would happen if we “sign” block letters all caps?
they want TOKEN to sign then sign as a TOKEN.
eowyndbh said:
Hi John, Your name is all caps is your strawman, your debtor, it was assigned by the Commerce Dept. when you were born (actually your mother was tricked into making you a U.S. citizen when you probably aren’t). You use your name in all caps in your UCC Financial Statement as your debtor, then you name in upper and lower case (John) as your creditor. ~ Denise
Californian said:
Thank you, my friend is having issues with paying a student loan. Can you give me a link I could read about student loans. Thanks, Ken
eowyndbh said:
Hi Ken,
No I don’t have a link. ~ Denise
Californian said:
Ok, thank you.
houseofcal said:
I got a certified copy of USA, inc from Delaware state – cost 58 bucks. This is a sports non for profit corporation setup in 1989. What relevance to the United States of America (USoA) defendant listed in Diversified Metal Product v. T-Bow et al I don’t know. I have not connected USoA to any statute or act of congress, has anyone else?
Californian said:
I terms of how you might sign any government form. You need to realize the ALL CAP NAME on your birth certificate is not your name. If you are a Christian. Its really just your given first name, but that’s best left for another topic.
Your proper live man/woman name is in lower case like Jane Or John Doe.
If you take a jewelers loop and look at the signature line on your check, you will discover it says authorized signature. So the government makes it clear they recognize you as a live man/woman. But kinda hide it from you. Notice the mp, stands for micro printing.
If you add authorized signature to say a driver application or 1040 form and print your name in proper English. They will get the point. They will know you know who you are. I always add without prejudice at arm’s length. I am now telling them I reserve my rights and that my signing does not give them any control over me or overmastering influence over me. That I do not trust them or their integrity.
The more of us who sign this way will go a long way toward gaining back our Republic. They can throw a few under the bus. But if thousands of us wake up and know who we are. That’s what we need.
Ken.
eowyndbh said:
Thanks Ken ~ Denise
teo said:
great info thanks all! You guys and gals may want to check out the earth plan dot com and the concept gaining popularity called peopleisim. It is taking root in South Africa presently, but gaining steam and signatures coming in from all over the planet. New constitution, take a look please if this is something you find interesting. there are provisions in the new constitution that get rid of all taxation and also pay dividends to the people. Peace.
eowyndbh said:
I would not trust a new constitution. There are much simpler ways to rid yourself of taxes. But a new constitution may take our right to keep and bear arms away, making us slaves to the system.
Teo said:
you obviously have not read the constitution as there are provisions for arms, but then again am I surprised? Everyone wants cake on a silver platter delivered with zero work, and some don’t even bother to read. Apathy and ignorance are not luxuries of freemen so you better get used to shackles, ignorance, etc because that is what you will get with that type of attitude. Since I am feeling benevolent I will serve you up a morsel, as perhaps there are others as lazy as you on this forum…
Article. Section.: 4.19 Right To Own & Carry Guns/Arms
The right to defend oneself from crime & oppression is an inalienable right. The right of Citizens to own, keep & carry weapons for defense, shall not be infringed. Non-Citizens may not own, carry, use or have access to any weapon, including any remotely controlled weapon, in any Universal Peopleisim Constitution region. Citizens may own weapons for defense, however, if more than half a County or one quarter of a Province vote to disarm any individual, that person shall respect their neighbors & immediately get rid of their weapons, or never enter the region that voted to disarm them.
houseofcal said:
To win in court you need lawful and legal (duly) arguments. In a republic such as our, federal or state statutes are not law. They are codes that you submit to in an arraignment, for example. Once we accept the jurisdiction of a ‘judge’, who’s primary role is to contain you within statutes/codes they call law, your rights are no longer of a people but that of a citizen. In your court cases you open an action at law in a court of record to retain your sovereignty – this freedom was granted to us when King George of England and his charters were expelled from the union. Otherwise, you are in an equity or worse, an admiralty like setting. In article 3 section 2 of the U.S. constitution we can seek justice be it at law, equity, or admiralty. Please visit 1215.org for more insight.
Lucy said:
Hi Denise,
I sent the irs more than a month ago a Notice of Demand for Verified Assessment for the years my husband and I owe and a Cease and Desist Abusive Collection Practices document. I also sent them a notarized Affidavit by Verified Declaration. I sent these documents to the Commissioner of Internal Revenue certified mail with return receipt/signature. Today I received a Notice of Intent to Levy. I did reference Title 15>Chapter 41>Subchapter V>ss 1692 so not sure why I received this Notice by Certified Mail. My husband did not sign and I did not include his ssn. I just figured my account (ssn) would have sufficed. Should I have included him and had him sign as well? I wonder if that would have made a difference.
eowyndbh said:
Sorry, I haven’t a clue, as to whether it would help ~ Denise
Californian said:
Hi Lucy, why do you owe them? Did you give them reason to think you owe them? Like sign a W-9 or W-4. Did you sign a W-4 and NOT add without prejudice at arm’s length?
Did you sign up for a bank account? That’s like a W-9. Did you add without prejudice. If you didn’t. Then try to open a non interest bearing checking account and when you sign, add without prejudice.
If you don’t have w/o prej on your bank accnt. they can pull the money out.
Try to think real hard. Are you getting any government benefit. Drivers lic. um, maybe unemployment checks. how about social security checks? I dont mean to drill you. maybe you even posted that info above already.
Do you identify yourself as your NAME.
Have you ever gained in your life at all from a government benefit. Like the use of their property. An engineer profits from the government codes. A Dr. A Lawyer, all profit from their codes?
Does your job or self emplyment exist in anyway, because of a government benefit or statute or code. Please consider every possibility that you are where you are in life because of a government benefit.
How about voting? are you registered to vote. Have you ever voted? Have you ever paid any taxes. Have you ever signed a 1040 tax return. They may think you are a taxpayer who is protesting if you all of a sudden stop paying them.
You may need to take it slow before you challenge them. Think very hard how they may know you. Taxpayer, Driver, spouse, voter. unemployed. US citizen. gun owners are US citizens. Wrote a letter to congress complaining as a US citizen.
You may need to pay them at this point, if you have gained at all in your entire life due to taking a past or current benefit. They will disgorge your bank account if you try to take a profit and not give them their cut.
Always refute that you are a taxpayer, US citizen, driver,spouse. etc.
I did the 15 USC 1692g myself. They paper terrorized me to death. But now I realize I am to connected to benefits still to challenge them. I am very careful now to sign without prejudice on all government forms.
Think about all your dealings with them. Go back and redo your drivers lic, sign without prejudice. all W-9 and W-4. add w/o prejudice. Do not use CA or AZ, etc. say California or Arizona for example. do not use zip codes. Get a new bank account, non interest bearing. add w/o prejudice.
You may have done all this already.
When all else fails. Just remember. You are a woman. Your husband a man. As only a man or woman has rights protected from the constitution. Adam came from the land. We come from the Land. Recall, the Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land.
Ken
Californian said:
It is my wish to update my post 8 21 2014. While much of what I said was correct, some of it was i being a parrot, repeating stupid garbage I read off the Internet. Don’t believe what you read on the Web.
I have signed without prejudice, etc on my 1040, etc. I have not used the zip code. spelled CA, California, etc. That is all BS. Don’t fall for silly crap. 15 USC 1692g has not really helped me after all. It doesn’t work with IRS. or creditors. IT just delays the inevitable.
I still believe the IRS. Is all bluff. I have done some things to piss them off an only caused me to lose several thousand dollars. Oh well. Now a they sent. A letter that said. I have been reading stuff off the Web and it’s just going to get me in trouble . One more letter to them, I am out 5k. I am done with the stupid crap I learned. Off the web.
What I have learned is that i am a man. Simple enough. I have many persons. I.E. Clark Kent is the man. SUPERMAN his person. Your name on your birth cert. Is your PERSON. AND so what. IT’S just business. It’s a benefit. YOU can access credit, buy homes, cars and lots of nice things. Cool…
There is no conspiracy, stop wasting time as I have. WE are oppressed by our neighbors, not the government.
The government is our servant. Nothing more or less. Just remind the man or woman in the government where you stand. THEY will not know what to do with you, believe me, they believe they are the boss.
I could go on and on. IF you believe. You are a man or woman and are the king. There is nothing more to explain
DON’T take no crap from your servants. IF you can’t pay your bills. Write a letter and tell them what you can afford until your finances improve. And stick with that number until your finances improve. If they refuse your best efforts, they are in dishonor
Just keep sending your payment no matter how much you can afford. Be a man of your word. Crap happens, finances change.
bamnana said:
question: we supposedly owe the IRS around 20,000.00 and they have a federal tax lien on our house for 197,000.00 how do we get them to take the lien off? and get them off our backs?
eowyndbh said:
Hi, I really don’t like to answer legal questions, but study the current post you are on. Some of the other posts might help you understand how to file paperwork, such as the “Oregon Department of Revenue Letter”. Also check out the Code of Federal Regulations under the IRS, and notice all the authorization codes in brackets. ~ Denise
Martin said:
I’ve got a similar problem, and I got a plan from an Eddie Kahn newsletter, where, at least here in Michigan, I did a UCC11 search under my name. Search came back negative so I’m submitting a request for a search by the UCC unit and see if there is a financing statement filed with my name by the IRS. Then should it come back negative, I’ll petition for the removal of the NFTL with a UCC3. This should get rid of notice of levy as well.
Californian said:
Petition “a supplication or prayer, especially to a deity,”
sconroy50 said:
Thank you for all of your very informative posts ! Whenever I visit . . .. . I find out the answer to my need! You have always supplied the knowledge! Sincere gratitude and indebtedness thank you . One of the key points that I took from reading the title 15 chapter 41 subchapter V subsection 1692a , was a gem . That being handwriting a refusal to pay or prayer of forgiveness of said debt. (then you are a real live natural person/human . Out of the fiction that way. That is what we all want , right?!
eowyndbh said:
Not me, Frank Austin England III. Yes, we are living flesh and blood, not fiction ~ Denise
Simon said:
There are a number of exhibits listed in the affidavit. I’ve tried to find copies of those exhibits, but have been unable. Can you advise on how to obtain copies of those exhibits?
eowyndbh said:
Hi Simon, Remember I am not the author of those documents. Frank Austin England III may have used his personal documents. ~ Denise
JB said:
No law requires any man/woman to fill out IRS forms. God created man, man created government.The creature is not above its creator. That which creates owns – Maxim of Law. Government created, driver, taxpayer, US citizen, employee, resident, etc. You are a man/woman yet you have free will to lower your status to an employee, resident, driver, US Citizen, taxpayer, etc. Californian is correct research whatever you read internet or otherwise. If you use any internet form look up the cited laws and cases. Knowing who you are and being able to defend yourself on that is the key. No where in any code, statute, regulation, ordinance, will you find ‘man’. Youtube Karl Lentz has audio that will help you understand defending yourself against men who act as judges, police, attorneys, agents, etc. from codes, statutes, etc with common law. IRS is a fiction. Man has the right to face his accuser. Sue in a court of record the man/woman acting as an IRS agent pointing their finger at you claiming you owe and filing liens against you. Have them take the stand question them to confirm you don’t owe the IRS Agent but some fiction called IRS. Have Mr(s). IRS agent and bring forth the man/woman named IRS so you can settle the debt. Habeus Corpus and Constitution you have the right to face your accuser. Everything is hearsay even affidavits until on the record in open court. Read the IRS Strategic Mission statement it states “voluntary” many times.
JB said:
Even in the IRS code you are not liable to file. This man won by stating the truth. http://www.save-a-patriot.org/files/view/long.html
eowyndbh said:
Hi JB, Most of the codes on the Code of Federal Regulations are in brackets, meaning they have been ommitted
eowyndbh said:
That is true!!! Failure to File and Pay Taxes is in brackets, meaning the authorization code has been omitted ~ Denise
kenneth johnson said:
Hello all who have ventured here, you would not be here if you haven’t got into some trouble.
I have posted many times. Got into trouble myself, :).
It’s been a long struggle that you should go thru to learn a good lesson. You may find the answers here to the test, but it’s best to know how we got the answer that anyone here gives.
I give credit to Karl Lentz for his time teaching. You can watch his videos.
I do believe the IRS is only a debt collector. You can stall them by asking for a validation of debt. You will discover that after a few months they will just clobber you. Why, because YOU made yourself liable for signing a W4, W9 or perhaps a bank account. I believe when you sign the bank account, that may also make you, “made liable”.
I didn’t write any codes and don’t recommend citing their codes, like UCC 1-308.
I do have to sign W9 forms for my business and sign “without prejudice at arms length”, [then]By Agent (signature) then a period. The IRS has not kicked them back to me, so they accept my conditional signing, they had their chance to counter my offer and didn’t.
[A quick side note yes and no is an answer. IE line 61 asks about health insurance]
Since most men and woman need a job, bank account and insurance, we sign unconditionally W4 and W9, etc. that may not be the best idea, at least sign “without prejudice at arms length” do something for goodness sakes.
A conditional signing means you make no promise, i believe i am not made liable with a conditional signing.
If i get in trouble again, I will write to the man acting as an agent and politely remind them of my conditional signing and they had the chance to counter my offer to contract conditionally. Along with my conditional signing is my option to rescind my signature, as i made no promise, i voluntarily signed for benefits.
Now, that i rescinded my signature, my hands are clean, there is no contract, no “made liable”. Now i can hold the man from the IRS liable for trespass should he proceed.
BTW, i tried a promissory note to pay a fine, they didn’t like that so much. LOL.
Ken
eowyndbh said:
Hi Ken, I became a state national through applying for my passport. But you have to have the documentation ahead of time that you are no longer a U.S. citizen. You always have a right to ex-patriot it is in the U.S. code, you can file paperwork in the county clerk’s office as well. Chance are you are not a U.S. citizen , unless you are serving in an office or the military. On the passport application give your documentation, do not use a SS# and put that your parents were not U.S. citizens, nor your spouse. You can not prove they were U.S. citizens http://www.coppermoonshinestills.com/id71.html ~ Dee
kenneth johnson said:
@eowyndbh, funny name, perhaps your parents were hippies. I am an man and at times one of the people. I need no permission from my public servants to do anything. Slavery is forbidden and no state may impair my obligation to contract.
My “person” the mask i were in public is secure and it’s my job to protect his signature when he contracts. Any contract i sign with my servants is voluntary and the code attached to any contract is chock full of “shall” , i shall stop, i shall go, i shall file, i shall keep records, shall…shall…shall. The contracts are so easy follow, because its voluntary.
Off i go to shall. Look at any code, the people are not in the code and order, required, or obligated are nowhere to be found. All persons shall…Ok, I shall file my tax return, I shall keep records, I shall stop at stop signs, I shall register my handgun. Ok, I sure shall.
In the mean time, I enjoy being an man and living free….
sharon said:
Can you be of help as to where the file no.’s to best acquire to print can be located so finding the correct print-out to print?pretty please? hurry a little bit as i wish to get this letter sent out by registered mail by weeks end. thank you thank you in advance!
sharon said:
Denise can i shorten the thirty days to fourteen and send it registered mail?
sconroy50 said:
Denise there is a short paragraph in the non negotiable letter that i am stuck on and need to ask for help to intepret. the paragraph starts off “Please transfer all assets from the Principal’s previous such accounts bearing the Registered Mail Numbers RR___________>> (Date) and RR ______________ . . . … . . . to the said account No. I know this _____________is BC No. and registered mail No. i mail agreement with. b ut m y question is what is RR stand for in the two places?
kenneth johnson said:
If you don’t know what RR means, are you sure you should be doing what your doing. Copy and paste another mans work will just get you in trouble.
sconroy50 said:
I hear you kenneth i sounded so uninformed! Actually when i learned that certified mail only gaurantees the envelope being delivered i started using registered mail and the RR finally clicked into mind right after i asked. but remmember there is no such thing as a dumb question
kenneth johnson said:
i meant no disrespect at all, we can get in deep trouble and best to be very careful. Please be careful how you interact with government agencies.
aztex2012 said:
Reblogged this on aztex2012.
RICHARD HEIDELBERG said:
Can this dialog be restarted? What’s has happened since this last comment? Is title 15 still a viable option in dealing with these rats? Is Denise still available?
Any additional comments?
Richard in Colorado