Tags
compelled contract, driver license, judge appointed agent, law merchant, Real :Party of Interest, red ink seal, red thumbprint seal, return for cause, return ticket, Rule 17, Title 28, traffic remedies, traffic ticket remedy, trust, UCC 1 -308
All past posts are now in a drop down below comments. )
(Blog Masters Note: Over a year ago, I was almost ticketed for not wearing a seat belt, got a warning notice instead. I asked Frank ‘Austin’ England III how I could proceed if I had gotten the ticket. Then we will proceed with an attachment that was e-mailed to me by Frank on the above title.
Do you sign citations in New Mexico? We don’t here, because someone had litigated the issue of a compelled contract and the state bailed before the precedent went the wrong way.
I return the citation to the issuing officer with . . .
RETURNED FOR CAUSE
WITHOUT COMMERCIAL DISHONOR
AND NO RECOURSE
WITHOUT PREJUDICE UCC 1-308
________________________thumb print in red ink as your seal
Signature
Got lots more on the statutory process and said process being private for profit copy right law . . . the statute can’t be enforced, it must be sold by the law merchant . . . that being the cop . . . but be careful not to go into controversy! I always ask the cop “Do we have an appointment?” and begin having fun from there , , ,
I told him I was not sovereign yet.
Absolutely . . . don’t get into the sovereign issue . . . boils down to you exercising your “natural right” to travel” in lieu of being regulated in commerce . . . all you are, is a customer of the DMV . . . you are being “treated” as a “driver”. You are simply the “Holder” (holder in due course) of the “License” that is needed to be in your possession for the law merchant to do business with you under the commerce clause, it is not your license, it belongs to the DMV. At the actual presentment of the citation, you can note, without prejudice UCC 1-308 and sign your name . . . this is the remedy built into the Uniform Commercial Code and you have the right to exercise that right. After you sign the citation, go home write across the face of the copy what I suggested and return it to the agent who made the offer. (be sure to get his or her complete name and the address of their office or barracks. When he stops you, he is acting in the nature of a police officer . . . then he makes the offer, he changes his hat and goes into law merchant mode and tries to sell you the statute . . . I tell them I’m not interested in doing business with them . . . they are dealing in private for profit copy right law, a law that cannot be enforced, only offered for acceptance . . . I’m not interested, what’s my consideration? See the attachments.
RATIFICATION OF COMMENCEMENT OF THE ACTION
By Joinder of a Trustee for the “Beneficiary” of the Trust
Title 28, Rules, Rule 17
Rule 17. Parties Plaintiff and Defendant; Capacity
(a) Real Party in Interest. Every action shall be prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest.
An executor, administrator, guardian, bailee, trustee of an express trust, a party with whom or in whose name a contract has been made for the benefit of another, or a party authorized by statute may sue in that person’s own name without joining the party for whose benefit the action is brought. No action shall be dismissed on the ground that it is not prosecuted in the name of the real party in interest until a reasonable time has been allowed after objection for ratification of commencement of the action by, or joinder or substitution of, the real party in interest; and such ratification, joinder, or substitution shall have the same effect as if the action had been commenced in the name of the real party in interest.
[emphasis by me] (Frank ‘Austin’ England)
(b) Capacity to Sue or Be Sued. The capacity of an individual, other than one acting in a representative capacity, to sue or be sued shall be determined by the law of the individual’s domicile. The capacity of a corporation to sue or be sued shall be determined by the law under which it was organized. In all other cases capacity to sue or be sued shall be determined by the law of the applicable state, except (1) that a partnership or other unincorporated association, which has no capacity by the law of its state, may sue or be sued in its common name for the purpose of enforcing for or against it a substantive right existing under the Constitution or laws of the United States, and (2) that the capacity of a receiver appointed by a court of the United States to sue or be sued in a court of the United States is governed by Title 28, U.S.C., Sections 754 and 959 (a).
(c) Infants or Incompetent Persons. Whenever an infant or incompetent person has a representative, such as a general guardian, committee, conservator, or other like fiduciary, the representative may sue or defend on behalf of the infant or incompetent person. An infant or incompetent person who does not have a duly appointed representative may sue by a next friend or by a guardian ad litem. The court shall appoint a guardian ad litem for an infant or incompetent person not otherwise represented in an action or shall make such other order as it deems proper for the protection of the infant or incompetent person.
“Your honor, I am the creditor and trustee. Do I have standing to speak?”
Another thing I heard on a Jack Smith audio, and this too was very interesting, was about a man that had to go into court on a ticket.
Here’s what he said when his name was called, and he was still outside the bar.
“Your honor, I am the creditor and trustee, do I have standing to speak?”
“I am the creditor and trustee of my independent account in the public trust, is the claimant present so I may accept his offer and close this account? And the judge was silent. So the guy said “How can we proceed without a claimant or agent coming forth on behalf of the claimant?” and the judge said “remove yourself from my courtroom immediately!
The guys next move, if he would have had the opportunity or the judge would attempt to push the courts bluff, would have been to appoint the judge as the agent/fiduciary for the claiment, so the judge would have had to appoint a trustee to settle and close the matter.
Freedom Documents 
I, like so many others interested in the freeman movement – have done the usual experiments and some worked and some didn’t – common guys or gals like us trying to outwit and outsmart the dues behind the robes ..to attempt to delegate our freedom and ill prepared to do so – but we try and some times at the cost of going to jail and having to pay the loot and the extortion to be free to carry on out daily affairs – its a slippery slope of abuse from them the agencies and their armed agents – the A4V. process on tickets does not work – stop attempting it – I did it and ended up with a bench (bank) warrant – the cops do not understand nor do they care – to them a warrant is a warrant and they got it rigged in their favor – Any A4V, process has to be between you and the CID of that process – the merchants know nothing about it – you give them an A4V – and they will arrest you and charge you for falsifying documents so do not attempt that with the agents and the agencies – one they don’t care and will arrest you – be aware and stop doing that in their processes. Its difficult to avoid joinder because if you don’t provide proper I.D., they arrest you and if you provide proper I.D., they create joinder – they will do anything to create joinder – when I was in jail they would not consider even releasing me unless I provided the information of the fiction to them so I had to other wise I would have been locked up in a box for ends of time – I was forced to provide the data to the fiction as me but knowing it wasn’t me – it is a commercial title they want to control and find reasons to suck currency from you and me.
Hi Johnny-Donald,
I think it is important to pay for certified copies of state statutes dealing with driving and note the authorization codes at the bottom. If those authorization codes are in brackets, then the statute has been omitted and can’t be enforced. At that point contact the head of dmv and let them know and offer to contract with them to provide for your own ID, plates, and a bond for your insurance. ~ Denise
Please tell me more .
Certified copies are important, if you can get them. ~ Denise
Follow previous instructions.
There is a gig in this whole freeman stuff that has from time to time keeps nagging my thoughts – If as we have learned that the courts operating in our system are owned by the IMF – who provide the currency we use – now when their courts take us in their process they are taking the same currency – FDR’s .. it doesn’t makes sense – why are they asking for the same currency they themselves provide for our use = I beg to ask what is the gig on that – does anyone understand that.
we use their money cuz there is nothing else and then they turn around and ask for it back – and send you to jail for it if you don’t have it or do not cough it up when they ask for it – I do not understand why they are asking us for the same money they give us – of course we earn it through our energy and we give it substance in value but we have nothing else to give but the same shit they allow us to use – we believe it is money for value but it really isn’t is what we are told – that it is just worthless paper – well that worthless paper buys my food – so there is a logic there I don’t understand, part of it is that it is our private script or allotment to energy we use for ourselves and their mission is by taking our money is to drain us of our energy – because when they take our private script they are taking food front our table – how to remedy that situation is a slippery slpoe of “hell I don’t know” –
follow previous instructions
Here’s a late question for you. I thought that the “defendant” was actually the beneficiary of the trust, and that the prosecutor (“government”) was the trustee, and that the object was to trick the “defendant” into identifying themself as the trustee, which is the only entity that can access funds from the trust. Can you possibly set me straight on this?
Hi Big M,
It is the corporate government that is trustee, if you are the defendant. If you know what you are doing in the courtroom you can make the judge trustee, and have him settle the case. ~ Denise
Would you be able to tell me in a fairly simple manner how you go about making the judge the trustee? Since they are part of what you’re calling (truthfully) “corporate government,” wouldn’t they already be the trustee in some form or other? Thanks.
Hi Big M,
I know there are video examples of making the judge the trustee and getting charges drop, lookup that term “making a judge trustee” on youtube. Also see another example, within the posts on here titled “Courts and Arraignment (Bonding the Charges)” . ~ Denise
Denise since as you say the lie called government is the “Trustee” and the “Court Clerk” appointed herself Administrator upon filing the “Unlawful” warrant that leaves the “defendant” the Beneficiary since NO entity can be all three. And why wouldn’t one file a Notice of Mistake with an Affidavit of Conditional Acceptance. Has worked for more than one of my friends I made them up for them they presented to Court clerk 3 trips to court for nothing more than New court date 4th trip CASE DISMISSED.
Hi Patrick, Bravo!!!! I have used “Austin’s” No such Corporation” – Nul Tiel Corporation – and in the final order, dismissing the matter, my name appeared in normal and not in all caps.~ Denise
The court clerk appointed herself as administrator of said Trust, when she filed the unlawful warrant. You Bring your Birth Certificate, when the NAME is called hold up your BC and say I have the defendant right here and appoint the prosecutor Trustee. Now your honor according to Trust law the “State” cannot be all three, Administrator, Trustee, and beneficiary so as beneficiary of said trust let us begin.